Suppr超能文献

急性单纯性心肌梗死的卧床休息

Bed rest for acute uncomplicated myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Herkner H, Arrich J, Havel C, Müllner M

机构信息

University of Vienna, Medical Faculty, Department of Emergency Medicine, Vienna General Hospital;, Währinger Gürtel 18-20 / 6D, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;2007(2):CD003836. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003836.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bed rest is prescribed to all patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but to a variable extent. Current guidelines (American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association) recommend at least 12 hours bed rest in patients with uncomplicated ST-elevation myocardial infarction, however the basis for this recommendation is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of short versus longer bed rest in patients with uncomplicated AMI.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE (January 1966 - August 2005), EMBASE (January 1988 - August 2005), PASCAL BioMed (January 1996 - August 2005); PsycINFO (January 1966 - August 2005) and BIOSIS Previews (January 1990 - August 2005).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of short versus longer bed rest in patients with uncomplicated AMI were sought.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Study selection was performed independently by at least two investigators according to the predefined inclusion criteria. Data were extracted by two investigators independently and in duplicate. Authors were contacted to obtain missing information.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 15 trials with 1487 patients assigned to a short period of bed rest (median 6 days) and 1471 patients assigned to longer bed rest (median 13 days). Generally the studies were outdated and appeared to be of moderate to poor methodological reporting quality. There was no evidence that shorter bed rest was more harmful than longer bed rest in terms of all cause mortality (RR=0.85 (95%CI 0.68 to 1.07), cardiac mortality (RR=0.81 (95%CI 0.54 to 1.19), or reinfarction (RR=1.07 (95%CI 0.79 to 1.44)).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Bed rest ranging from 2 to 12 days appears to be as safe as longer periods of bed rest. The quality of most trials is unsatisfactory. Current bed rest recommendations are not supported by the existing evidence as the optimal duration of bed rest is unknown. The lack of adequate trials is surprising, considering the large size of several studies to compare effectiveness of drugs on people with AMI.

摘要

背景

所有急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者都被要求卧床休息,但卧床时间长短不一。当前指南(美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会)建议无并发症的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者至少卧床休息12小时,然而这一建议的依据尚不清楚。

目的

比较无并发症AMI患者短期与长期卧床休息的效果。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》,2005年第2期)、MEDLINE(1966年1月至2005年8月)、EMBASE(1988年1月至2005年8月)、PASCAL生物医学数据库(1996年1月至2005年8月);PsycINFO(1966年1月至2005年8月)和BIOSIS预评数据库(1990年1月至2005年8月)。

选择标准

寻找关于无并发症AMI患者短期与长期卧床休息的随机和半随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

研究选择至少由两名研究者根据预定义的纳入标准独立进行。数据由两名研究者独立且重复提取。联系作者以获取缺失信息。

主要结果

我们发现15项试验,1487例患者被分配至短期卧床休息(中位时间6天),1471例患者被分配至长期卧床休息(中位时间13天)。总体而言,这些研究较为陈旧,方法学报告质量似乎为中等至较差。没有证据表明在全因死亡率(RR = 0.85(95%CI 0.68至1.07))、心脏死亡率(RR = 0.81(95%CI 0.54至1.19))或再梗死方面(RR = 1.07(95%CI 0.79至1.44)),短期卧床休息比长期卧床休息更有害。

作者结论

2至12天的卧床休息似乎与更长时间的卧床休息一样安全。大多数试验的质量不尽人意。由于卧床休息的最佳时长未知,现有证据不支持当前的卧床休息建议。考虑到有多项大型研究比较药物对AMI患者的疗效,缺乏充分的试验令人惊讶。

相似文献

1
Bed rest for acute uncomplicated myocardial infarction.急性单纯性心肌梗死的卧床休息
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;2007(2):CD003836. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003836.pub2.
2
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
3
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
6
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 6;11(11):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4.
7
Interventions for infantile haemangiomas of the skin.皮肤婴儿血管瘤的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD006545. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006545.pub3.

本文引用的文献

2
"Armchair" treatment of acute coronary thrombosis.急性冠状动脉血栓形成的“非卧床”治疗
J Am Med Assoc. 1952 Apr 19;148(16):1365-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.1952.02930160001001.
4
The management of myocardial infarction with particular reference to the chair treatment.
Ann Intern Med. 1954 Dec;41(6):1189-95. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-41-6-1189.
5
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.评估荟萃分析中的异质性
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
8
Prospective study of early discharge after acute myocardial infarction (SHORT).
Eur Heart J. 2000 Jun;21(12):992-9. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1943.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验