Assessing the 'cyclodiode G-probe' using a grey scale test: reproducibility and differences between probes.

AIMS

1. To determine the number of clinicians performing cyclodiode therapy who reuse the 'G-probe' used for the delivery of cyclodiode therapy. 2. To show a simple method to assess the output of the 'G-probe' that can be used in the clinical setting.

METHODS

A total of 71 questionnaires were sent to ophthalmologists who have an Oculight SLx Iris Medical Diode Laser. Ophthalmologists were asked as to whether they performed cycloablative therapy using the 'G-probe' and whether they reused the G-probe. They were also asked as to the frequency of any reuse of probes. To determine the output of the 'G-probe', paper copies of a custom-made grey scale chart containing graded blocks of increasing shades of grey densities were produced. A special probe holder was made so that the G-probe tip could be held at a fixed distance from the grey scale chart. Laser burns were made on the grey scale using this arrangement and measurements of the burn size were made. After using 'standard settings' of 2000 ms and 2000 mW, 'threshold' burns were defined. Five new probes (with two different operators) were tested to assess the interprobe, interoperator, and intersheet variability of test. Probes were then tested for the burn size produced between 1000 and 3000 mW, and 1000 and 3000 ms.

RESULTS

Results from the questionnaire showed that of the 44 respondents (62.0% response), 93.2% performed cyclodiode therapy with 58.5% reusing the G-probe. Among them, 56.1% reused probes on more than one occasion. Results from testing a new G-probe on the grey scale chart showed that with 'standard settings', highly reproducible burns at grey density 8 could be produced. No significant interprobe, interoperator, and intersheet variations were noted. Above 3 J of laser energy, the test could detect a 20% increase in energy settings and it was found that at levels of 4 J or above, alterations to the power setting had a greater influence on burn production than alterations to the time setting.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates 1. that many clinicians in the UK reuse G-probes, 2. a simple, quick, and highly reproducible method to assess the laser output from the G-probe used for cyclodiode therapy. The method can help the ophthalmic surgeon to test the G-probe prior to commencement of therapy and with a standard treatment protocol, may produce a more predictable intraocular pressure reduction.