Suppr超能文献

经巩膜睫状体光凝探头用无菌一次性探头套

Sterile single use cover for the G-probe Transscleral Cyclodiode.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2011 Apr-May;20(4):260-5. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181e08109.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Multiuse of the G-probe transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (TSCPC) device can lead to contamination. We evaluated the mechanical stability and clinical efficacy of a disposable sterile barrier for the G-probe footplate.

METHODS

We measured diode laser output with and without the G-probe barrier both before and after cadaver TSCPC (18 shots at 2000 mW for 2000mS). Qualitative analyses of the laser aiming beam were made before each trial in the barrier and nonbarrier state. After each trial, the G-probe barrier was examined for microperforations and footplate for debris and/or damage. Microbiology was taken on the cadaver eye and the G-probe before and after 20 cycles. Histologic analysis after TSCPC with and without barrier was carried out on a cadaver eye.

RESULTS

Qualitatively, laser focus dispersion was minimized by the G-probe cover. Mean (95% CI) laser output was measured for the nonbarrier, with barrier pre-TSCPC and with barrier post-TSCPC, respectively as 980 mW (899,1061), 1247 mW (1115, 1378), and 1240 mW (1132, 1347). The difference between the nonbarrier and barrier both preTSCPC and postTSCPC was statistically significant (df=2, F=36.26, P<0.01). No perforations in the G-probe barrier were evident and no debris or damage was detected on the G-probe. Pathology was consistent with earlier reports of TSCPC in cadaver eyes. Microbial segregation of the cadaver eye and the G-probe footplate was maintained.

CONCLUSIONS

The G-probe barrier is an effective and robust method to protect consecutive patients from contamination during TSCPC. Although energy levels were slightly higher in probes with barrier, histologic differences were not evident and the clinical significance of this finding is likely limited.

摘要

目的

G 探针经巩膜睫状体光凝(TSCPC)装置的多次使用可能导致污染。我们评估了 G 探针底板一次性无菌屏障的机械稳定性和临床效果。

方法

我们在尸体 TSCPC 前后(2000mS 时 2000mW 下 18 次射击)测量了有和没有 G 探针屏障的二极管激光输出。在每次试验前,分别在有和无屏障的情况下对激光瞄准光束进行定性分析。每次试验后,检查 G 探针屏障是否有微孔,探针底板是否有碎屑和/或损坏。在 20 次循环前后,对尸体眼球和 G 探针进行微生物取样。在有和没有屏障的情况下进行 TSCPC 后,对尸体眼球进行组织学分析。

结果

G 探针盖可使激光焦点分散最小化。无屏障、TSCPC 前有屏障和 TSCPC 后有屏障的平均(95%CI)激光输出分别为 980mW(899,1061)、1247mW(1115,1378)和 1240mW(1132,1347)。无屏障与 TSCPC 前后有屏障的差异均具有统计学意义(df=2,F=36.26,P<0.01)。G 探针屏障没有明显的穿孔,G 探针上也没有发现碎屑或损坏。病理学与以前关于尸体眼球 TSCPC 的报告一致。尸体眼球和 G 探针底板的微生物分离得到维持。

结论

G 探针屏障是一种有效且坚固的方法,可在 TSCPC 期间保护连续患者免受污染。尽管带有屏障的探针能量水平略高,但组织学差异不明显,这种发现的临床意义可能有限。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验