Meuwissen Martijn, Siebes Maria, Spaan Jos A E, Piek Jan J
Department of Cardiology, B2-108, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Z Kardiol. 2002;91 Suppl 3:108-12. doi: 10.1007/s00392-002-1319-8.
The routine use of sensor-tipped guide wires for the assessment of functional coronary lesion severity has become widespread in the catheterization laboratory. The physiological parameters derived from pressure or flow velocity measurements, fractional flow reserve, relative and absolute coronary blood flow velocity reserve show a high agreement with noninvasive stress testing for myocardial ischemia. However, since these parameters are based on either intracoronary pressure or flow velocity, they do not investigate the hemodynamics of the coronary circulation completely, leading to ambiguous or conflicting outcomes. Only the use of simultaneously measured distal pressure and flow velocity will avoid any possible misinterpretation of the data. We have successfully used an index of stenosis resistance during maximal hyperemia to characterize the functional significance of a coronary stenosis. Recent developments in guide wire technology, currently used for research investigations, put these simultaneous measurements within clinical reach.
在导管实验室中,使用带有传感器的导丝常规评估冠状动脉病变的功能严重程度已变得十分普遍。从压力或流速测量得出的生理参数、血流储备分数、相对和绝对冠状动脉血流速度储备与心肌缺血的无创应激测试高度一致。然而,由于这些参数要么基于冠状动脉内压力,要么基于流速,它们并未全面研究冠状动脉循环的血流动力学,导致结果模糊或相互矛盾。只有同时测量远端压力和流速才能避免对数据的任何可能误解。我们已成功使用最大充血时的狭窄阻力指数来表征冠状动脉狭窄的功能意义。目前用于研究的导丝技术的最新进展使这些同步测量在临床上成为可能。