Meuwissen Martijn, Siebes Maria, Chamuleau Steven A J, Tijssen Jan G P, Spaan Jos A E, Piek Jan J
Department of Cardiology, Room B2-250, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2003 Sep;1(3):471-9. doi: 10.1586/14779072.1.3.471.
Adequate patient selection for percutaneous coronary intervention is of utmost importance to minimize early and late complications. Consequently, objective evidence for myocardial ischemia is mandatory for the management of patients with coronary artery disease, in particular in multivessel disease and intermediate lesions (40-70% diameter stenosis on angiography). The use of sensor-equipped guide wires for the assessment of functional coronary lesion severity has become widespread in the catheterization laboratory. The indices derived from pressure or flow measurements, fractional flow reserve, coronary flow velocity reserve and relative coronary flow velocity reserve show a high agreement with noninvasive stress testing. However, while these indices are based on either intracoronary pressure or flow, they do not investigate the hemodynamics of the coronary circulation entirely, leading to ambiguous outcomes. Only the use of simultaneously measured pressure and flow will avoid any possible misinterpretation of the data.
为使经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的早期和晚期并发症降至最低,对患者进行充分的选择至关重要。因此,对于冠心病患者的管理,尤其是多支血管病变和中度病变(血管造影显示直径狭窄40%-70%)的患者,心肌缺血的客观证据是必不可少的。配备传感器的导丝用于评估冠状动脉病变的功能严重程度,这在导管实验室中已广泛应用。从压力或流量测量得出的指标,如血流储备分数、冠状动脉血流速度储备和相对冠状动脉血流速度储备,与无创性负荷试验高度一致。然而,虽然这些指标基于冠状动脉内压力或流量,但它们并未完全研究冠状动脉循环的血流动力学,导致结果不明确。只有同时测量压力和流量才能避免对数据的任何可能误解。