Mumtaz Rushda, Shaukat Masud, Ramirez Francisco C
Department of Medicine, Carl T. Hayden Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003 Apr;36(4):310-4. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200304000-00006.
Dieulafoy's lesion is a rare but important cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Current endoscopic methods used to treat Dieulafoy's lesion include injection, with or without thermal methods, and mechanical methods. The latter include variceal ligation and hemoclips. There are no studies comparing the outcomes of rubber band ligation and injection with or without thermal therapy.
To report the outcomes of Dieulafoy's lesion treated endoscopically with rubber band ligation and injection with or without thermal therapy at a single institution.
Patients with the diagnosis of Dieulafoy's lesion treated endoscopically at the Carl T. Hayden VA Medical Center in Phoenix, between August 1994 and August 2002 were analyzed. Demographic data, mode of presentation, risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding, hemodynamic parameters, blood transfusion requirements, endoscopic findings, details of endoscopic therapy, length of stay in ICU/hospital, complications, recurrence of bleeding, and mortality rates were collected and compared between those receiving endoscopic band ligation (EBL group) and those receiving injection with or without thermal therapy (non-EBL group).
Twenty-three patients with Dieulafoy's lesion (14 in the EBL group and nine in the non-EBL group) were studied. All patients were men. The mean age, hemoglobin levels on admission, and the transfusion requirements before therapy were similar in both groups. Fourteen patients (eight in the EBL- and six in the non-EBL groups) presented with hematemesis and the remaining with melena. The majority of Dieulafoy's lesions (91.3%) were located in the stomach and two in the duodenum. Active bleeding at the time of endoscopy was seen in 61% of cases, and immediate hemostasis was achieved with either method in 100% of patients. Early rebleeding (within 72 hours of endoscopic therapy) occurred in only one patient treated with epinephrine plus heater probe therapy. The length of stay in ICU was longer in the non-EBL group (6.7 days) compared with the EBL group (1.8 days) (P = 0.2). There were six deaths (three in the non-EBL group and three in the EBL group) within 30 days of the index hospitalization. The causes of death included infection/sepsis (n = 3), complications of acute myocardial infarction (n = 2), and end-stage liver disease (n = 1).
Endoscopic rubber band ligation is as effective as injection with or without thermal therapy in the treatment of Dieulafoy's lesion.
Dieulafoy病是上消化道出血的一种罕见但重要的病因。目前用于治疗Dieulafoy病的内镜方法包括注射(有无热凝方法)和机械方法。后者包括曲张静脉结扎术和止血夹。尚无研究比较橡皮圈套扎术与有无热凝治疗的注射术的疗效。
报告在单一机构中内镜下橡皮圈套扎术与有无热凝治疗的注射术治疗Dieulafoy病的疗效。
分析1994年8月至2002年8月在凤凰城卡尔·T·海登退伍军人事务医疗中心接受内镜治疗的Dieulafoy病患者。收集人口统计学数据、临床表现方式、胃肠道出血的危险因素、血流动力学参数、输血需求、内镜检查结果、内镜治疗细节、入住重症监护病房/医院的时间、并发症、出血复发情况及死亡率,并在接受内镜下套扎术(EBL组)和接受有无热凝治疗的注射术(非EBL组)的患者之间进行比较。
研究了23例Dieulafoy病患者(EBL组14例,非EBL组9例)。所有患者均为男性。两组患者的平均年龄、入院时血红蛋白水平及治疗前输血需求相似。14例患者(EBL组8例,非EBL组6例)表现为呕血,其余表现为黑便。大多数Dieulafoy病病变(91.3%)位于胃,2例位于十二指肠。61%的病例在内镜检查时可见活动性出血,两种方法均使100%的患者立即止血。仅1例接受肾上腺素加热探头治疗的患者发生早期再出血(内镜治疗后72小时内)。非EBL组入住重症监护病房的时间(6.7天)比EBL组长(1.8天)(P = 0.2)。在首次住院30天内有6例死亡(非EBL组3例,EBL组3例)。死亡原因包括感染/脓毒症(n = 3)、急性心肌梗死并发症(n = 2)和终末期肝病(n = 1)。
内镜下橡皮圈套扎术在治疗Dieulafoy病方面与有无热凝治疗的注射术效果相同。