• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高四年级医学生药品不良反应报告的质量。

Improving the quality of adverse drug reaction reporting by 4th-year medical students.

作者信息

Rosebraugh Curtis J, Tsong Yi, Zhou Feng, Chen Min, Mackey Ann Corken, Flowers Charlene, Toyer Denise, Flockhart David A, Honig Peter K

机构信息

United States Food and Drug Administration, Room 10B-45, HFD-570, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003 Mar;12(2):97-101. doi: 10.1002/pds.797.

DOI:10.1002/pds.797
PMID:12642973
Abstract

PURPOSE

Evaluate whether a 15-minute lecture intervention will improve adverse drug reaction reporting quality on standard MedWatch forms.

METHODS

Seventy-eight 4th-year medical students were randomized to intervention 'Group-A' or non-intervention 'Group-B' on the first day of a required five-day clinical pharmacology rotation. Group-A participants attended a 15-minute lecture on completing a MedWatch form with quality information considered by the Food and Drug Administration as critical to adequate adverse drug reaction reporting. Group-B participants did not attend this lecture. Both groups then watched a standardized patient interview of a recognizable adverse drug reaction and completed MedWatch forms. Four Safety Evaluators from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rated student responses in a blinded fashion for the primary efficacy variable of Overall Impression and six informational domins using a standardized data quality analysis form that was developed within the Office of Postmarketing Drug Risk Assessment of the FDA.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight MedWatch forms were evaluated (Group-A = 40, Group B = 38). Overall MedWatch information quality scores for the intervention group were significantly higher than the non-intervention group (p < 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

As little as a 15-minute intervention can significantly improve the quality of adverse drug reaction reporting by 4th-year medical students. Academic medical centers should consider incorporating adverse drug reaction reporting curriculum into the clinical training of medical students.

摘要

目的

评估一次15分钟的讲座干预是否会提高标准MedWatch表格上药物不良反应报告的质量。

方法

在为期五天的临床药理学轮转的第一天,78名四年级医学生被随机分为干预组“A组”或非干预组“B组”。A组参与者参加了一场15分钟的讲座,内容是填写MedWatch表格,其中包含美国食品药品监督管理局认为对充分报告药物不良反应至关重要的质量信息。B组参与者未参加此次讲座。然后两组都观看了一段关于可识别的药物不良反应的标准化患者访谈视频,并填写MedWatch表格。来自美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的四名安全评估员以盲法对学生的回答进行评分,评估总体印象这一主要疗效变量以及使用FDA上市后药物风险评估办公室制定的标准化数据质量分析表评估六个信息领域。

结果

共评估了78份MedWatch表格(A组 = 40份,B组 = 38份)。干预组的MedWatch信息总体质量得分显著高于非干预组(p < 0.004)。

结论

仅15分钟的干预就能显著提高四年级医学生药物不良反应报告的质量。学术医学中心应考虑将药物不良反应报告课程纳入医学生的临床培训中。

相似文献

1
Improving the quality of adverse drug reaction reporting by 4th-year medical students.提高四年级医学生药品不良反应报告的质量。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003 Mar;12(2):97-101. doi: 10.1002/pds.797.
2
Adverse drug reactions, MedWatch reporting and medical student education.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003 Mar;12(2):93-5. doi: 10.1002/pds.801.
3
Adverse drug event surveillance and drug withdrawals in the United States, 1969-2002: the importance of reporting suspected reactions.1969 - 2002年美国药品不良事件监测与药物撤市:报告疑似不良反应的重要性
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jun 27;165(12):1363-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.12.1363.
4
Form for reporting serious adverse events and product problems with human drug and biological products and devices; availability--FDA. Notice.用于报告人用药品、生物制品和器械严重不良事件及产品问题的表格;可获取性——美国食品药品监督管理局。通知。
Fed Regist. 1993 Jun 3;58(105):31596-614.
5
Toward improved adverse event/suspected adverse drug reaction reporting.迈向改进不良事件/疑似药物不良反应报告。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003 Mar;12(2):89-91. doi: 10.1002/pds.800.
6
Improving patient care by reporting problems with medical devices.通过报告医疗设备问题来改善患者护理。
CRNA. 1998 Nov;9(4):139-56.
7
The state of dietary supplement adverse event reporting in the United States.美国膳食补充剂不良事件报告的现状。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Oct;17(10):962-70. doi: 10.1002/pds.1627.
8
MedWatch: the FDA medical products reporting program.医疗观察:美国食品药品监督管理局医疗产品报告计划。
Am Fam Physician. 1993 Sep 15;48(4):636-8.
9
Physicians' understanding of the regulation of dietary supplements.医生对膳食补充剂监管的理解。
Arch Intern Med. 2007 May 14;167(9):966-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.9.966.
10
Medication errors: an analysis comparing PHICO's closed claims data and PHICO's Event Reporting Trending System (PERTS).用药差错:一项比较PHICO的结案索赔数据与PHICO事件报告趋势系统(PERTS)的分析。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Jul;43(7):754-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholders' knowledge, attitudes and practices to pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reaction reporting in clinical trials: a mixed methods study.利益相关者对临床试验中药物警戒和药品不良反应报告的知识、态度及实践:一项混合方法研究
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;76(10):1363-1372. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-02921-0. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
2
An analysis of completeness and quality of adverse drug reaction reports at an adverse drug reaction monitoring centre in Western India.印度西部一家药品不良反应监测中心的药品不良反应报告完整性及质量分析
Perspect Clin Res. 2018 Jul-Sep;9(3):123-126. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_105_17.
3
Urgent need to modernize pharmacovigilance education in healthcare curricula: review of the literature.
迫切需要使医疗保健课程中的药物警戒教育现代化:文献综述
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;74(10):1235-1248. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2500-y. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
4
The adverse drug reaction reporting assignment for specialist oncology nurses: a preliminary evaluation of quality, relevance and educational value in a prospective cohort study.肿瘤专科护士药物不良反应报告任务:一项前瞻性队列研究中对质量、相关性和教育价值的初步评估。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2018 Jan;391(1):17-26. doi: 10.1007/s00210-017-1430-z. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
5
Feasibility and Educational Value of a Student-Run Pharmacovigilance Programme: A Prospective Cohort Study.学生主导的药物警戒计划的可行性和教育价值:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Drug Saf. 2017 May;40(5):409-418. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0502-1.
6
Strategies to improve adverse drug reaction reporting: a critical and systematic review.提高药物不良反应报告策略:批判性和系统性评价。
Drug Saf. 2013 May;36(5):317-28. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0058-2.
7
Pharmacy students' knowledge and perceptions about pharmacovigilance in Malaysian public universities.马来西亚公立大学药学学生对药物警戒的知识和看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Jun 10;75(5):96. doi: 10.5688/ajpe75596.
8
Improving reporting of adverse drug reactions: Systematic review.改进药物不良反应报告:系统评价。
Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Aug 9;1:75-92. doi: 10.2147/clep.s4775.
9
Role of medical students in preventing patient harm and enhancing patient safety.医学生在预防患者伤害及提高患者安全方面的作用。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Aug;15(4):272-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.018044.