Thomson Robert L, Forsman Jukka T, Mönkkönen Mikko
Department of Biology, University of Oulu, POB 3000, 90014 Oulu, Finland.
Oecologia. 2003 Feb;134(3):431-8. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-1140-0. Epub 2003 Jan 10.
We experimentally tested the conditions where heterospecific attraction is more likely to occur. The heterospecific attraction hypothesis predicts that colonizing or migrant individuals use the presence of resident species as a cue for profitable breeding sites. In other words, increasing resident densities will result in increased migrant densities until the costs of interspecific competition override the benefits of heterospecific attraction. The experiment consisted of a reference and a manipulation year. In the reference year, resident titmice were permitted to breed at intermediate densities whilst in the manipulation year, resident densities were manipulated in nine study plots. Three treatments were performed as low, intermediate and high resident densities and migrant density responses were measured in both years. Relative between-year migrant and resident densities were analyzed by regression analysis. Migrant foliage gleaning guild densities responded linearly and positively, as did densities of habitat generalists, in particular Chaffinch ( Fringilla coelebs),. The ground-foraging guild did not show a response. This study provides support for predictions of the heterospecific attraction hypothesis and suggests that information on habitat quality with reference to both food availability and safe breeding sites are important in using heterospecifics as cues. Based on Chaffinch response data, artificially increased resident densities were not high enough for competitive effects between residents and migrants to decrease heterospecific attraction. It seems unlikely that in northern environments natural resident densities will reach high levels where competitive effects would occur, therefore heterospecific attraction will always be beneficial. This study again shows the importance of heterospecific attraction in migrant habitat selection and as a process promoting species diversity in northern breeding bird assemblages.
我们通过实验测试了异种吸引更有可能发生的条件。异种吸引假说预测,定居或迁徙的个体利用当地物种的存在作为有利可图的繁殖地的线索。换句话说,当地物种密度的增加将导致迁徙物种密度的增加,直到种间竞争的成本超过异种吸引的好处。该实验包括一个参照年和一个操作年。在参照年,允许当地的山雀以中等密度繁殖,而在操作年,在九个研究地块中控制当地物种的密度。设置了低、中、高三种当地物种密度处理,并在两年中测量了迁徙物种的密度反应。通过回归分析分析了年际间迁徙物种和当地物种的相对密度。迁徙的叶层觅食类群的密度呈线性正响应,栖息地通才类群的密度也是如此,特别是苍头燕雀(Fringilla coelebs)。地面觅食类群没有表现出反应。这项研究为异种吸引假说的预测提供了支持,并表明关于栖息地质量的信息,包括食物可获得性和安全繁殖地,对于将异种作为线索很重要。根据苍头燕雀的反应数据,人为增加的当地物种密度不足以使当地物种和迁徙物种之间的竞争效应降低异种吸引。在北方环境中,自然的当地物种密度似乎不太可能达到会产生竞争效应的高水平,因此异种吸引总是有益的。这项研究再次表明了异种吸引在迁徙物种栖息地选择中的重要性,以及作为促进北方繁殖鸟类群落物种多样性的一个过程的重要性。