Department of Ecology and Genetics, University of Oulu, 90014, Oulu, Finland.
National Resources Institute Finland, University of Oulu, 90014, Oulu, Finland.
Oecologia. 2020 Apr;192(4):965-977. doi: 10.1007/s00442-020-04629-5. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
Breeding habitat choice and investment decisions are key contributors to fitness in animals. Density of individuals is a well-known cue of habitat quality used for future breeding decisions, but accuracy of density cues decreases as individuals disperse from breeding sites. Used nests remain an available information source also after breeding season, but whether such information is used for breeding decisions is less well known. We experimentally investigated whether migratory, cavity-nesting pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) prospect potential breeding sites after breeding season and use old nests as a cue for future breeding decisions. In late summer 2013, forest sites were assigned to four treatments: (1) sites including nest boxes with old nests of heterospecifics (tits), (2) sites including suitable but empty nest boxes, (3) sites with unsuitable nest boxes, or (4) sites without any nest boxes. In the following year, we investigated pied flycatcher habitat choice and reproductive investment according to these "past" cues while also controlling for additional information sources present during settlement. Flycatchers preferred sites where tits had been perceived to breed in the previous year, but only if great tits were also currently breeding in the site and had a relatively high number of eggs. Old flycatchers avoided sites previously treated with suitable but empty cavities, whereas young flycatchers preferred sites where tits had apparently bred in the previous year. Also egg mass, but not clutch size or clutch mass, was affected by the combination of past treatment information and current tit abundance.
繁殖栖息地选择和投资决策是动物适应度的关键因素。个体密度是用于未来繁殖决策的已知栖息地质量的线索,但随着个体从繁殖地扩散,密度线索的准确性会降低。即使在繁殖季节之后,使用过的巢仍然是可用的信息来源,但这种信息是否被用于繁殖决策却知之甚少。我们实验性地调查了迁徙的、洞穴筑巢的白腰文鸟(Ficedula hypoleuca)是否会在繁殖季节后寻找潜在的繁殖地,并利用旧巢作为未来繁殖决策的线索。在 2013 年夏末,森林地点被分配到四个处理组:(1)包括带有异种种群(山雀)旧巢的巢箱的地点,(2)包括合适但空巢箱的地点,(3)包括不合适的巢箱的地点,或(4)没有任何巢箱的地点。在次年,我们根据这些“过去”的线索调查了白腰文鸟的栖息地选择和生殖投资,同时还控制了定居期间存在的其他信息来源。白腰文鸟更喜欢那些在前一年被认为有山雀繁殖的地点,但只有当大山雀在该地点繁殖并且相对有较多的卵时才会这样。旧的白腰文鸟避免了之前用合适但空的洞穴处理过的地点,而年轻的白腰文鸟则更喜欢那些在前一年显然有山雀繁殖的地点。卵质量,但不是卵数或卵质量,受到过去处理信息和当前山雀数量的组合的影响。