Diagnosis: highlighting the gaps.
作者信息
Straus Sharon E
出版信息
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Mar;18(3):228-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.30115.x.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Diagnosis: highlighting the gaps.诊断：凸显差距。
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Mar;18(3):228-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.30115.x.
2
Evidence-based medicine in otolaryngology, Part 3: everyday probabilities: diagnostic tests with binary results.循证医学在耳鼻喉科中的应用，第 3 部分：日常可能性：二项结果诊断测试。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Aug;147(2):185-92. doi: 10.1177/0194599812447750. Epub 2012 May 15.
3
Evidence-based medicine in otolaryngology Part 4: everyday probabilities--nonbinary diagnostic tests.循证医学在耳鼻喉科中的应用 第 4 部分：日常可能性——非二进制诊断测试。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Aug;149(2):179-86. doi: 10.1177/0194599813491070. Epub 2013 May 28.
4
Diagnostic dilemma.
Am J Med. 1998 Apr;104(4):406-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(98)00051-5.
5
Sensitivity, predictive values, pretest-posttest probabilities, and likelihood ratios of presurgery clinical diagnosis of nonmelanoma skin cancers.非黑色素瘤皮肤癌术前临床诊断的敏感性、预测值、检验前后概率及似然比。
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2011 Mar;30(1):50-4. doi: 10.3109/15569527.2010.521227. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
6
Assessing diagnostic and screening tests: Part 2. How to use the research literature on diagnosis.评估诊断和筛查测试：第2部分。如何运用关于诊断的研究文献。
West J Med. 2001 Jul;175(1):37-41. doi: 10.1136/ewjm.175.1.37.
7
Statistical methods for evidence-based medicine: the diagnostic test. Part II.循证医学的统计方法：诊断试验。第二部分。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2008 Sep;74(9):481-8. Epub 2008 Mar 21.
8
Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 5. The effect of spectrum of disease on the performance of diagnostic tests.循证医学学习者小贴士：5. 疾病谱对诊断试验性能的影响。
CMAJ. 2005 Aug 16;173(4):385-90. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1031666.
9
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南：第5部分。诊断准确性研究。
Pain Physician. 2009 May-Jun;12(3):517-40.
10
[Diagnosis: meanders and shortcuts].
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2007 Nov 28;96(48):1897-900. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157.96.48.1897.
本文引用的文献
1
Could our pretest probabilities become evidence based? A prospective survey of hospital practice.我们的预检概率能否基于证据得出？一项关于医院实践的前瞻性调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Mar;18(3):203-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20215.x.
2
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.迈向完整、准确的诊断准确性研究报告：STARD倡议。
BMJ. 2003 Jan 4;326(7379):41-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7379.41.
3
The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration.用于报告诊断准确性研究的STARD声明：解释与详述
Clin Chem. 2003 Jan;49(1):7-18. doi: 10.1373/49.1.7.
4
Quantitative evaluation of the diagnostic thinking process in medical students.医学生诊断思维过程的定量评估。
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Nov;17(11):839-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.20139.x.
5
Which methods for bedside Bayes?用于床边贝叶斯分析的方法有哪些？
ACP J Club. 2001 Nov-Dec;135(3):A11-2.
6
Why we need large, simple studies of the clinical examination: the problem and a proposed solution. CARE-COAD1 group. Clinical Assessment of the Reliability of the Examination-Chronic Obstructive Airways Disease Group.为何我们需要针对临床检查开展大规模的简单研究：问题与一个提议的解决方案。CARE - COAD1 小组。检查可靠性的临床评估——慢性阻塞性气道疾病小组。
Lancet. 1999 Nov 13;354(9191):1721-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)01174-5.
7
Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.医生为何不遵循临床实践指南？一个改进框架。
JAMA. 1999 Oct 20;282(15):1458-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.15.1458.
8
Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests.诊断试验研究中与设计相关的偏倚的实证证据。
JAMA. 1999 Sep 15;282(11):1061-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.11.1061.
9
Finding and applying evidence during clinical rounds: the "evidence cart".在临床查房过程中寻找和应用证据：“证据推车”。
JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1336-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1336.
10
The effect of changing disease risk on clinical reasoning.疾病风险变化对临床推理的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Sep;9(9):488-95. doi: 10.1007/BF02599218.
Zotero 插件