• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死临床紧急情况下的知情同意(HERO-2同意子研究):一项前瞻性观察性研究。

Informed consent during the clinical emergency of acute myocardial infarction (HERO-2 consent substudy): a prospective observational study.

作者信息

Williams Barbara F, French John K, White Harvey D

机构信息

Cardiovascular Research Unit, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Lancet. 2003 Mar 15;361(9361):918-22. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12773-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12773-0
PMID:12648970
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anxiety, fear, pain, and treatment with morphine might compromise the ability of patients to comprehend information about, and give informed consent for, participation in clinical trials. We aimed to assess whether patients with acute myocardial infarction could understand written and verbal information and whether they were competent to give autonomous informed consent to participate in a clinical trial.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 399 patients with acute myocardial infarction in 16 hospitals in New Zealand and Australia who were eligible for participation in the Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion (HERO)-2 trial. We assessed readability of patient information sheets, patients' educational status, their views of the consent process, comprehension of verbal and written information, and competence to give consent.

FINDINGS

The patient information sheet needed a year 13 (age 18) educational level for comprehension, although only 75 of 345 patients (22%) had been educated beyond secondary school. Only 63 of 346 (18%) read the patient information sheet before giving or refusing consent to participate. Patients who gave consent were more likely to report good or partial comprehension of the information provided than were those who refused consent (272 [89%] vs 14 [70%], respectively; p=0.009). In an assessment of competence to make an autonomous decision, 75 of 145 (52%) were ranked at the lowest grade and 26 (18%) were not competent to consent.

INTERPRETATION

Although the consent process for HERO-2 met regulatory requirements for clinical trials, it was inappropriate for the needs of most patients. The patients' comprehension of the information provided and their competence to autonomously give consent was less than optimum.

摘要

背景

焦虑、恐惧、疼痛以及吗啡治疗可能会损害患者理解参与临床试验相关信息并给予知情同意的能力。我们旨在评估急性心肌梗死患者是否能够理解书面和口头信息,以及他们是否有能力自主给予参与临床试验的知情同意。

方法

我们对新西兰和澳大利亚16家医院的399例急性心肌梗死患者进行了前瞻性研究,这些患者符合参与希鲁洛与早期再灌注或闭塞(HERO)-2试验的条件。我们评估了患者信息表的可读性、患者的教育程度、他们对同意过程的看法、对口头和书面信息的理解以及给予同意的能力。

结果

患者信息表需要13年级(18岁)的教育水平才能理解,尽管345例患者中只有75例(22%)接受过中学以上教育。在给予或拒绝参与同意之前,346例患者中只有63例(18%)阅读了患者信息表。同意参与的患者比拒绝同意的患者更有可能报告对所提供信息有良好或部分理解(分别为272例[89%]对14例[70%];p=0.009)。在对自主决策能力的评估中,145例患者中有75例(52%)被评为最低等级,26例(18%)没有同意的能力。

解读

尽管HERO-2试验的同意过程符合临床试验的监管要求,但它并不适合大多数患者的需求。患者对所提供信息的理解以及他们自主给予同意的能力并不理想。

相似文献

1
Informed consent during the clinical emergency of acute myocardial infarction (HERO-2 consent substudy): a prospective observational study.急性心肌梗死临床紧急情况下的知情同意(HERO-2同意子研究):一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Lancet. 2003 Mar 15;361(9361):918-22. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12773-0.
2
Do patients with acute medical conditions have the capacity to give informed consent for emergency medicine research?患有急性疾病的患者是否有能力对急诊医学研究给予知情同意?
Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Aug;6(8):776-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb01205.x.
3
Patients' perceptions of informed consent in acute myocardial infarction research: a questionnaire based survey of the consent process in the DANAMI-2 trial.急性心肌梗死研究中患者对知情同意的认知:基于问卷调查的DANAMI-2试验同意过程研究
Heart. 2004 Oct;90(10):1124-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.021931.
4
Patients' experiences of intervention trials on the treatment of myocardial infarction: is it time to adjust the informed consent procedure to the patient's capacity?患者参与心肌梗死治疗干预试验的体验:是时候根据患者能力调整知情同意程序了吗?
Heart. 2001 Dec;86(6):632-7. doi: 10.1136/heart.86.6.632.
5
[Ethical approach to informed consent for participation in clinical studies in acute cerebral infarct].[急性脑梗死临床研究参与知情同意的伦理方法]
Presse Med. 2000;29(24):1335-40.
6
Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.一项关于参与临床试验的易读知情同意书的随机对照试验:东部肿瘤协作组的研究
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Mar 1;21(5):836-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.07.022.
7
The elderly patient and informed consent. Empirical findings.老年患者与知情同意。实证研究结果。
JAMA. 1984 Sep 14;252(10):1302-6.
8
Informed consent for cataract surgery: patient understanding of verbal, written, and videotaped information.白内障手术的知情同意:患者对口头、书面和录像信息的理解。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jan;38(1):80-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.07.030. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
9
Ethical issues of informed consent in acute stroke. Analysis of the modalities of consent in 56 patients enrolled in urgent therapeutic trials.急性卒中知情同意的伦理问题。对56例参加紧急治疗试验患者的同意方式分析。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;19(2):65-8. doi: 10.1159/000083250. Epub 2005 Jan 11.
10
Easy-to-Read Informed Consent Form for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Clinical Trials: Results from the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1205 Study.血液和骨髓移植临床试验网络 1205 研究:易于阅读的造血细胞移植临床试验知情同意书结果。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Oct;24(10):2145-2151. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Ability of patients with acute ischemic stroke to recall given information on intravenous thrombolysis: Results of a prospective multicenter study.急性缺血性脑卒中患者对静脉溶栓治疗相关信息的回忆能力:一项前瞻性多中心研究结果。
Eur Stroke J. 2023 Mar;8(1):241-250. doi: 10.1177/23969873221143856. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
2
Patients acceptance and comprehension to written and verbal consent (PAC-VC).患者对书面和口头同意的接受和理解(PAC-VC)。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Feb 23;24(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00893-1.
3
Deferred Consent in an Acute Stroke Trial from a Patient, Proxy, and Physician Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
从患者、代理和医生的角度来看急性中风试验中的延迟同意:一项横断面调查。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Apr;36(2):621-629. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01357-3. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
4
Potential benefit in information providing and influence on patient anxiety and satisfaction by means of preoperative explanatory videos in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: study protocol of a multicentre, double-blinded, randomised parallel-group controlled trial.全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术前解释性视频在信息提供和患者焦虑及满意度方面的潜在获益:一项多中心、双盲、随机平行组对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 26;11(1):e043702. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043702.
5
Barriers and challenges in the process of including critically ill patients in clinical studies.纳入危重症患者参与临床研究的过程中的障碍和挑战。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 8;28(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00732-x.
6
A review of informed consent and how it has evolved to protect vulnerable participants in emergency care research.关于知情同意及其如何演变以保护急诊护理研究中弱势参与者的综述。
EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Feb 26;5(2):73-79. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.180051. eCollection 2020 Feb.
7
Determinants of Patient and Surrogate Experiences With Acute Care Research Consent: A Key Informant Interview Study.患者和代理人对急性护理研究同意的体验的决定因素:关键知情人访谈研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 19;8(22):e012599. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012599. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
8
Optimising informed consent for participants in a randomised controlled trial in rural Uganda: a comparative prospective cohort mixed-methods study.优化乌干达农村地区一项随机对照试验参与者的知情同意:一项比较性前瞻性队列混合方法研究。
Trials. 2018 Dec 22;19(1):699. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3030-8.
9
A Digital Decision Support Tool to Enhance Decisional Capacity for Clinical Trial Consent: Design and Development.一种增强临床试验同意决策能力的数字决策支持工具:设计与开发。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jun 6;7(6):e10525. doi: 10.2196/10525.
10
Educational video-assisted versus conventional informed consent for trauma-related debridement surgery: a parallel group randomized controlled trial.教育视频辅助与传统方式进行创伤相关清创手术知情同意的比较:一项平行组随机对照试验。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Mar 9;19(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0264-7.