Nakajima M, Aomi S, Nonoyama M, Tomioka H, Bonkohara Y, Saito H, Endo M, Kurosawa H
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Institute of Japan, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kyobu Geka. 2003 Mar;56(3):175-80; discussion 180-2.
Hypothermic bypass with circulatory arrest for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair is employed for its protective effect on spinal cord function and because it avoids clamping the diseased aorta. However, organ dysfunction caused by reperfusion injury as well as bleeding tendencies due to deep hypothermia have been described. In this paper we compared the efficacies of the hypothermic and normothermic operations.
Between February 1996 and June 2000, 28 patients underwent thoracoabdominal aortic repair. Twenty-three patients were men, 5 were women, and the median age was 55.3 (range 23 to 75 years). Fourteen patients had aortic dissection, and 7 had Marfan syndrome. Fourteen patients required reconstruction of visceral arteries. Twelve patients underwent TAAA repair under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (H group), and 15 under normothermic distal perfusion (N group), while 1 patient underwent a simple clamp procedure. Perioperative data and early outcomes were compared between groups.
The overall 30-day mortality rate was 0%, but 3 patients (25.0%) in II group, and 1 patient (6.3%) in N group died during hospital stay. Operation time and bypass time were longer in H group than N group (operative time 793 min vs. 481 min (p < 0.05): cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time 255 min vs. 102 min (p < 0.05). Also, more intraoperative bleeding was found in H group than in N group (3,506 ml vs. 1,220 ml). Spinal cord neurologic deficit did not occur in either group. Respiratory failure occurred in 3 patients (25.0%) in H group and one (6.3%) in N group. Renal failure occurred in 3 (25.0%) in H group, and none in N group.
Early and mid-term outcome of TAAA repair was almost satisfactory and without neurospiral complications. The deep hypothermic operation is more likely to induce postoperative respiratory and renal dysfunction than the normothermic operation. TAAA repair using deep hypothermic circulatory arrest should be limited to patients with TAAA involving the distal arch or a severely calcified aortic wall.
胸腹主动脉瘤(TAAA)修复术中采用低温体外循环合并循环停止技术,是因其对脊髓功能具有保护作用,且可避免钳夹病变的主动脉。然而,已有文献报道了再灌注损伤所致的器官功能障碍以及深度低温引起的出血倾向。在本文中,我们比较了低温手术和常温手术的疗效。
1996年2月至2000年6月期间,28例患者接受了胸腹主动脉修复术。其中男性23例,女性5例,中位年龄为55.3岁(范围23至75岁)。14例患者患有主动脉夹层,7例患有马凡综合征。14例患者需要重建内脏动脉。12例患者在深度低温循环停止(H组)下接受TAAA修复,15例在常温下进行远端灌注(N组),1例患者接受了单纯钳夹手术。比较两组的围手术期数据和早期结果。
总体30天死亡率为0%,但H组有3例患者(25.0%)、N组有1例患者(6.3%)在住院期间死亡。H组的手术时间和体外循环时间长于N组(手术时间793分钟对481分钟(p < 0.05);心肺转流(CPB)时间255分钟对102分钟(p < 0.05))。此外,H组术中出血比N组多(3506毫升对1220毫升)。两组均未发生脊髓神经功能缺损。H组有3例患者(25.0%)发生呼吸衰竭,N组有例患者(6.3%)发生呼吸衰竭。H组有3例患者(25.0%)发生肾衰竭,N组无肾衰竭发生。
TAAA修复术的早期和中期结果几乎令人满意,且无神经脊髓并发症。与常温手术相比,深度低温手术更易导致术后呼吸和肾功能障碍。采用深度低温循环停止的TAAA修复术应仅限于累及主动脉弓远端或主动脉壁严重钙化的TAAA患者。