Raisinghani Manish, Faingold Carl L
Department of Pharmacology, Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine, P.O. Box 19629, Springfield 62794-9629, USA.
Brain Res. 2003 Mar 28;967(1-2):113-22. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(02)04232-4.
Comparative studies of neuronal networks that subserve convulsions in closely-related epilepsy models are revealing instructive data about the pathophysiological mechanisms that govern these networks. Studies of audiogenic seizures (AGS) in genetically epilepsy-prone rats (GEPRs) and related forms of AGS demonstrate important network similarities and differences. Two substrains of GEPRs exist, GEPR-9s, exhibiting tonic AGS, and GEPR-3s, exhibiting clonic AGS. The neuronal network for tonic AGS resides exclusively in brainstem nuclei, but forebrain sites, including the amygdala (AMG), are recruited after repetitive AGS induction. The neuronal network for clonic AGS remains to be investigated. The present study examined the neuronal network for clonic AGS in GEPR-3s by microinjecting a competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, D,L-2-amino-7-phosphonoheptanoic acid (AP7), into the central nucleus of inferior colliculus (ICc), deep layers of superior colliculus (DLSC), periaqueductal grey (PAG), or caudal pontine reticular formation (cPRF), which are implicated in tonic AGS networks. Microinjections into AMG and perirhinal cortex (PRh), which are not implicated in AGS, were also done. AGS in GEPR-3s were blocked reversibly after microinjections into ICc, DLSC, PAG or cPRF. However, AGS were also blocked by AP7 in AMG but not PRh. The sites in which AP7 blocks AGS are implicated as requisite components of the clonic AGS network, and these data support a critical role for NMDA receptors in clonic AGS modulation. The brainstem nuclei of the clonic AGS network are identical to those subserving tonic AGS. However, the requisite involvement of AMG in the clonic AGS network, which is not seen in tonic AGS, is surprising and suggests important mechanistic differences between clonic and tonic forms of AGS.
在密切相关的癫痫模型中,对引发惊厥的神经网络进行的比较研究正在揭示有关支配这些网络的病理生理机制的有益数据。对遗传性癫痫易感大鼠(GEPRs)的听源性惊厥(AGS)及相关形式的AGS研究表明,其网络存在重要的相似性和差异。GEPRs有两个亚系,即表现为强直性AGS的GEPR - 9s和表现为阵挛性AGS的GEPR - 3s。强直性AGS的神经网络仅存在于脑干核团中,但在重复诱导AGS后,包括杏仁核(AMG)在内的前脑部位也会被激活。阵挛性AGS的神经网络仍有待研究。本研究通过向与强直性AGS网络有关的下丘中央核(ICc)、上丘深层(DLSC)、导水管周围灰质(PAG)或尾侧脑桥网状结构(cPRF)微量注射竞争性NMDA受体拮抗剂D,L - 2 -氨基 - 7 - 磷酸庚酸(AP7),来研究GEPR - 3s中阵挛性AGS的神经网络。还对与AGS无关的AMG和梨状周围皮质(PRh)进行了微量注射。向ICc、DLSC、PAG或cPRF微量注射后,GEPR - 3s中的AGS被可逆性阻断。然而,AP7在AMG中也能阻断AGS,但在PRh中则不能。AP7阻断AGS的部位被认为是阵挛性AGS网络的必要组成部分,这些数据支持NMDA受体在阵挛性AGS调节中起关键作用。阵挛性AGS网络的脑干核团与支持强直性AGS的核团相同。然而,AMG在阵挛性AGS网络中的必要参与在强直性AGS中未见,这令人惊讶,并表明阵挛性和强直性AGS形式之间存在重要机制差异。