Strohmer Bernhard, Hwang Chun, Peter C Thomas, Chen Peng-Sheng
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2003 Feb;8(1):49-57. doi: 10.1023/a:1022344032001.
The study tests the hypothesis that ablating all inputs to the atrioventricular (AV) node can result in complete heart block with stable junctional escape rhythm.
We attempted atrionodal input ablation in 76 consecutive patients with uncontrolled atrial fibrillation. Fast and slow pathways were first ablated. If there was no AV block, additional energy applications were done between fast and slow pathway locations. The patients were followed for 42 +/- 11 months. Group I (n = 57) comprised patients with complete heart block and junctional escape rhythm (53 +/- 4 beats/min) at the end of the procedure. The escape rhythm remained stable throughout follow-up. Group II (n = 15) were patients who failed the stepwise atrionodal input ablation and required AV junctional ablation guided by His bundle potential to achieve complete heart block. Four patients showed a slow escape rhythm after ablation (33 +/- 4 beats/min). Others had no escape rhythm. All 15 pts remained pacemaker dependent. The total death rate of groups I and II was 18/57 (31.6%) vs 10/15 (66.7%), respectively (p < 0.02). These differences could not be explained by a difference of left ventricular ejection fraction (0.42 +/- 0.07 vs 0.41 +/- 0.04, respectively, p = NS).
(1) In most patients, ablation of both fast and slow pathways did not result in complete heart block, indicating the presence of multiple atrionodal inputs. (2) Ablation of all atrionodal inputs may result in complete heart block with stable junctional escape rhythm. (3) As compared with AV junctional ablation, atrionodal input ablation was associated with a lower mortality rate on long-term follow up.
本研究检验以下假设:消融房室(AV)结的所有输入可导致完全性心脏传导阻滞并伴有稳定的交界性逸搏心律。
我们对76例持续性房颤控制不佳的患者尝试进行房室结输入消融。首先消融快径路和慢径路。如果未出现房室传导阻滞,则在快径路和慢径路位置之间额外施加能量。对患者进行了42±11个月的随访。第一组(n = 57)包括在手术结束时出现完全性心脏传导阻滞和交界性逸搏心律(53±4次/分钟)的患者。在整个随访期间,逸搏心律保持稳定。第二组(n = 15)是逐步房室结输入消融失败且需要在希氏束电位引导下进行房室交界区消融以实现完全性心脏传导阻滞的患者。4例患者在消融后出现缓慢的逸搏心律(33±4次/分钟)。其他患者没有逸搏心律。所有15例患者均依赖起搏器。第一组和第二组的总死亡率分别为18/57(31.6%)和10/15(66.7%)(p < 0.02)。这些差异不能用左心室射血分数的差异来解释(分别为0.42±0.07和0.41±0.04,p =无显著性差异)。
(1)在大多数患者中,消融快径路和慢径路均未导致完全性心脏传导阻滞,表明存在多个房室结输入。(2)消融所有房室结输入可能导致完全性心脏传导阻滞并伴有稳定的交界性逸搏心律。(3)与房室交界区消融相比,房室结输入消融在长期随访中死亡率较低。