Ohara K, Tsunoda H, Nishida M, Sugahara S, Hashimoto T, Shioyama Y, Hasezawa K, Yoshikawa H, Akine Y, Itai Y
Department of Radiation Oncology, Tsukuba University Hospital, Tsukuba City, Japan.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003 Mar-Apr;13(2):170-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2003.13014.x.
We investigated whether a small pelvic (SP) field that covers primarily the pericervical regions in postoperative radiotherapy for cervical squamous cell carcinoma is adequate for a subgroup of node-negative patients. Of 84 patients with stage I-II disease treated with postoperative radiotherapy due to pathologic risk factors, 42 node-negative patients received SP-field radiotherapy, whereas remaining 42 node-positive patients were treated with a conventional whole pelvic (WP) field that also covered pelvic lymph nodes, both with 50.0-50.4 Gy/25-28 fractions. The pathologic risk factors included positive nodes, deep stromal invasion (>/=2 /3 thickness), parametrial extension, and positive or close surgical margin. Recurrence was identified for 20 patients: three in the SP group and 17 in the WP group. Intrapelvic recurrence accounted for all three recurrences in the SP group and for four in the WP group; 5-year pelvic-control rate did not differ significantly between the SP (93%) and WP (90%) groups. Extrapelvic recurrence (n = 11) was identified exclusively in the WP group. Patterns of recurrence indicate that use of an SP field instead of a WP field may be adequate in postoperative radiotherapy for a subgroup of node-negative, high-risk patients.
我们研究了在宫颈鳞状细胞癌术后放疗中,主要覆盖宫颈周围区域的小盆腔(SP)野对于一组淋巴结阴性患者是否足够。在84例因病理危险因素接受术后放疗的I-II期疾病患者中,42例淋巴结阴性患者接受了SP野放疗,而其余42例淋巴结阳性患者接受了也覆盖盆腔淋巴结的传统全盆腔(WP)野放疗,两者均为50.0 - 50.4 Gy/25 - 28次分割。病理危险因素包括阳性淋巴结、深部基质浸润(≥2/3厚度)、宫旁浸润以及手术切缘阳性或接近阳性。20例患者出现复发:SP组3例,WP组17例。盆腔内复发占SP组所有3例复发以及WP组4例复发;SP组(93%)和WP组(90%)的5年盆腔控制率无显著差异。盆腔外复发(n = 11)仅在WP组中发现。复发模式表明,对于一组淋巴结阴性的高危患者,在术后放疗中使用SP野而非WP野可能足够。