[TFCC-lesion. MR arthrography vs. arthroscopy of the wrist].

In a blinded study from January to July 2000, 125 patients suffering from specific complaints of the wrist were examined with direct MR arthrography prospectively. Within 24 hours an arthroscopy of the wrist was performed. With the MR arthrography in 70 patients or 56% of all patients injury of the TFCC was diagnosed. In 65 patients this could be verified arthroscopically. In the remaining 55 patients no TFCC lesion was diagnosed with the MR arthrography. However lesions were found via arthroscopy in three cases,were MRI findings expected an intact TFCC. In the remaining 52 cases the MRT could exclude a lesion of the TFCC correctly. An agreement of the MRT and arthroscopic results could be determined in 93.6% of the cases (correlation). The diagnosis of a TFCC lesion by means of MRI was correct in 94% of the cases (sensitivity), the exclusion of such lesion in 89% (specificity). Positive or negative predictive values of 91% or 93% were achieved. Since neither a specificity nor a sensitivity of 100% can be reached at the moment, the MR arthrography cannot replace the arthroscopy. However it could be a potent additional tool for wrist diagnosis if intraarticular contrast is used. It can facilitate the diagnostics and the indication for surgery at the ulnocarpal wrist and help to reduce arthroscopic interventions that are only for diagnostic purposes and without any therapeutic consequences. With improvement of the technique of magnet resonance tomography we can expect further increase of accuracy and the clinical use of the MR arthrography in the diagnostic workup at the ulnocarpal wrist.