Wagner Anja, Barrows Alicia, Wijnen Juul Th, van der Klift Heleen, Franken Patrick F, Verkuijlen Paul, Nakagawa Hidewaki, Geugien Marjan, Jaghmohan-Changur Shantie, Breukel Cor, Meijers-Heijboer Hanne, Morreau Hans, van Puijenbroek Marjo, Burn John, Coronel Stephany, Kinarski Yulia, Okimoto Ross, Watson Patrice, Lynch Jane F, de la Chapelle Albert, Lynch Henry T, Fodde Riccardo
Center for Human and Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Am J Hum Genet. 2003 May;72(5):1088-100. doi: 10.1086/373963. Epub 2003 Mar 25.
The identification of germline mutations in families with HNPCC is hampered by genetic heterogeneity and clinical variability. In previous studies, MSH2 and MLH1 mutations were found in approximately two-thirds of the Amsterdam-criteria-positive families and in much lower percentages of the Amsterdam-criteria-negative families. Therefore, a considerable proportion of HNPCC seems not to be accounted for by the major mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Does the latter result from a lack of sensitivity of mutation detection techniques, or do additional genes underlie the remaining cases? In this study we address these questions by thoroughly investigating a cohort of clinically selected North American families with HNPCC. We analyzed 59 clinically well-defined U.S. families with HNPCC for MSH2, MLH1, and MSH6 mutations. To maximize mutation detection, different techniques were employed, including denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, Southern analysis, microsatellite instability, immunohistochemistry, and monoallelic expression analysis. In 45 (92%) of the 49 Amsterdam-criteria-positive families and in 7 (70%) of the 10 Amsterdam-criteria-negative families, a mutation was detected in one of the three analyzed MMR genes. Forty-nine mutations were in MSH2 or MLH1, and only three were in MSH6. A considerable proportion (27%) of the mutations were genomic rearrangements (12 in MSH2 and 2 in MLH1). Notably, a deletion encompassing exons 1-6 of MSH2 was detected in seven apparently unrelated families (12% of the total cohort) and was subsequently proven to be a founder. Screening of a second U.S. cohort with HNPCC from Ohio allowed the identification of two additional kindreds with the identical founder deletion. In the present study, we show that optimal mutation detection in HNPCC is achieved by combining accurate and expert clinical selection with an extensive mutation detection strategy. Notably, we identified a common North American deletion in MSH2, accounting for approximately 10% of our cohort. Genealogical, molecular, and haplotype studies showed that this deletion represents a North American founder mutation that could be traced back to the 19th century.
遗传异质性和临床变异性阻碍了遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)家系中种系突变的鉴定。在先前的研究中,约三分之二符合阿姆斯特丹标准阳性的家系中发现了MSH2和MLH1突变,而在符合阿姆斯特丹标准阴性的家系中这一比例要低得多。因此,相当一部分HNPCC似乎无法用主要的错配修复(MMR)基因来解释。这一结果是由于突变检测技术缺乏敏感性,还是有其他基因导致了其余病例的发生?在本研究中,我们通过对一组临床选择的北美HNPCC家系进行深入调查来解决这些问题。我们分析了59个临床明确诊断为HNPCC的美国家系中的MSH2、MLH1和MSH6突变。为了最大限度地检测到突变,我们采用了不同的技术,包括变性梯度凝胶电泳、Southern分析、微卫星不稳定性检测、免疫组织化学和单等位基因表达分析。在49个符合阿姆斯特丹标准阳性的家系中有45个(92%),在10个符合阿姆斯特丹标准阴性的家系中有7个(70%),在分析的三个MMR基因之一中检测到了突变。49个突变发生在MSH2或MLH1中,只有3个发生在MSH6中。相当一部分(27%)突变是基因组重排(MSH2中有12个,MLH1中有2个)。值得注意的是,在7个明显无关的家系(占总队列的12%)中检测到一个包含MSH2外显子1 - 6的缺失,随后被证明是一个始祖突变。对来自俄亥俄州的另一组美国HNPCC队列进行筛查,又发现了另外两个携带相同始祖缺失的家系。在本研究中,我们表明,通过将准确且专业的临床选择与广泛的突变检测策略相结合,可以实现HNPCC中最佳的突变检测。值得注意的是,我们在MSH2中发现了一个常见的北美缺失,约占我们队列的10%。系谱、分子和单倍型研究表明,这种缺失代表了一个可追溯到19世纪的北美始祖突变。