Hawi Z, Lowe N, Kirley A, Gruenhage F, Nöthen M, Greenwood T, Kelsoe J, Fitzgerald M, Gill M
Department of Genetics and Psychiatry, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Mol Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;8(3):299-308. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001290.
Abnormalities in dopaminergic neurotransmission are now accepted as factors in predisposing to ADHD. Evidence of associations between dopamine transporter gene polymorphism and ADHD was first reported by Cook et al. We confirmed the DAT1 association and also identified two additional susceptibility loci at the DRD5 and DBH. Notably, none of the associated variants at these three genes are known to be expressed. Other variants within or closely mapped to the associated alleles are likely to be relevant. In this investigation, we analyse additional markers creating a high-density map across and flanking these genes, and measure intermarker linkage disequilibrium (LD). None of the newly examined markers were more strongly associated with ADHD. At DAT1, the pattern of intermarker LD and haplotype association with the phenotype between exon 9 and the 3' of the gene suggests that the functional variant at DAT1 may be located to this region. For DRD5, three markers, covering a region of approximately 68 kb including the single DRD5 exon are all associated with disease, and thus do not provide localizing information. However, the data for DBH point to a region close to the centre of the gene. Correlation between D' and physical distance was observed between markers at DAT1 and DRD5 for distances less than 50 kb. This was not the case for DBH, where LD breakdown was observed between the intron 5 and intron 9 polymorphisms although they are only 9 kb apart. Further genetic analysis is unlikely to refine the location of susceptibility variants and functional assessment of variants within associated regions is required.
多巴胺能神经传递异常现已被公认为是易患注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的因素。Cook等人首次报道了多巴胺转运体基因多态性与ADHD之间的关联证据。我们证实了DAT1的关联性,并在DRD5和DBH处还发现了另外两个易感基因座。值得注意的是,这三个基因的相关变异均未发现有表达。与相关等位基因位于同一区域内或紧密连锁的其他变异可能具有相关性。在本研究中,我们分析了额外的标记,构建了跨越这些基因及其侧翼的高密度图谱,并测量了标记间的连锁不平衡(LD)。新检测的标记中没有一个与ADHD的关联性更强。在DAT1基因上,外显子9与该基因3'端之间标记间LD模式以及单倍型与表型的关联表明,DAT1的功能性变异可能位于该区域。对于DRD5基因,三个标记覆盖了包括单个DRD5外显子在内的约68 kb区域,均与疾病相关,因此无法提供定位信息。然而,DBH的数据指向靠近基因中心的一个区域。在DAT1和DRD5基因座上,当距离小于50 kb时,观察到标记间的D'与物理距离之间存在相关性。DBH的情况并非如此,尽管内含子5和内含子9的多态性仅相隔9 kb,但在它们之间观察到了LD的瓦解。进一步的基因分析不太可能精确确定易感变异的位置,因此需要对相关区域内的变异进行功能评估。