Neuropsychiatric Genetics Group, Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 May;19(5):577-82. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.250. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
A number of genes with function related to synaptic neurochemistry have been genetically associated with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. However, susceptibility to the development of common psychiatric disorders by single variants acting alone, can so far only explain a small proportion of the heritability of the phenotype. It has been postulated that the unexplained 'dark heritability' may at least in part be due to epistatic effects, which may account for the small observed marginal associations, and the difficulties with replication of positive findings. We undertook a comprehensive exploration of pair-wise interactions between genetic variants in 24 candidate genic regions involved in monoaminergic catabolism, anabolism, release, re-uptake and signal transmission in a sample of 177 parent-affected child trios using a case-only design and a case-pseudocontrol design using conditional logistic regression. Marker-pairs thresholded on interaction odds ratio (OR) and P-value are presented. We detected a number of interaction ORs >4.0, including an interesting correlation between markers in the ADRA1B and DBH genes in affected individuals, and several further interesting but smaller effects. These effects are no larger than you would expect by chance under the assumption of independence of all pair-wise relations; however, independence is unlikely. Furthermore, the size of these effects is of interest and attempts to replicate these results in other samples are anticipated.
一些与突触神经化学功能相关的基因已被遗传关联与注意缺陷/多动障碍。然而,单一变体单独作用对常见精神障碍发展的易感性,到目前为止只能解释表型遗传力的一小部分。有人假设,未解释的“暗遗传力”至少部分可能是由于上位效应,这可能解释了观察到的边际关联较小,以及阳性发现的复制困难。我们在一个由 177 个受影响的父母-子女三胞胎组成的样本中,使用仅病例设计和使用条件逻辑回归的病例拟似对照设计,对涉及单胺能代谢、合成、释放、再摄取和信号转导的 24 个候选基因区域中的遗传变异进行了全面的两两相互作用探索。呈现了基于相互作用优势比 (OR) 和 P 值的标记对。我们检测到许多相互作用 OR>4.0,包括受影响个体中 ADRA1B 和 DBH 基因中的标记之间的有趣相关性,以及几个进一步的有趣但较小的影响。这些效应并不比你在所有成对关系独立的假设下,通过假设的机会得到的更大;然而,独立性是不太可能的。此外,这些效应的大小是有趣的,并预计在其他样本中尝试复制这些结果。