Lavery Lawrence A, Armstrong David G, Wunderlich Robert P, Tredwell Jeffrey, Boulton Andrew J M
Diabetex Research Group, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2003 Apr;26(4):1069-73. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.4.1069.
To evaluate the effectiveness of dynamic plantar pressure assessment to determine patients at high risk for neuropathic ulceration. In choosing the cut point, we looked for an optimum combination of sensitivity and specificity of plantar pressure to screen for neuropathic ulceration.
A total of 1,666 consecutive individuals with diabetes (50.3% male) presenting to a large urban managed care-based outpatient clinic were enrolled in this longitudinal 2-year outcome study. Patients received a standardized medical and musculoskeletal assessment at the time of enrollment, including evaluation in an onsite gait laboratory.
Of the entire population, 263 patients (15.8%) either presented with or developed an ulcer during the 24-month follow-up period. As expected, baseline peak plantar pressure was significantly higher in the ulcerated group than in the group who did not ulcerate (95.5 +/- 26.4 vs. 85.1 +/- 27.3 N/cm(2), P < 0.001). There was also a trend toward increased pressure with increasing numbers of foot deformities, as well as with increasing foot risk classification (P = 0.0001). Peak pressure was not a suitable diagnostic tool by itself to identify high-risk patients. After eliminating patients without loss of protective sensation, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the optimal cut point, as determined by a balance of sensitivity and specificity, was 87.5 N/cm(2), yielding a sensitivity of 63.5% and a specificity of 46.3%.
The data from this evaluation continue to support the notion that elevated foot pressure is an important risk factor for foot complications. However, the ROC analysis suggests that foot pressure is a poor tool by itself to predict foot ulcers.
评估动态足底压力评估在确定神经性溃疡高危患者方面的有效性。在选择切点时,我们寻找足底压力敏感性和特异性的最佳组合以筛查神经性溃疡。
本纵向2年结局研究纳入了1666例连续就诊于一家大型城市管理式医疗门诊的糖尿病患者(男性占50.3%)。患者在入组时接受了标准化的医学和肌肉骨骼评估,包括在现场步态实验室进行评估。
在整个研究人群中,263例患者(15.8%)在24个月的随访期内出现或发生了溃疡。正如预期的那样,溃疡组的基线足底峰值压力显著高于未发生溃疡的组(95.5±26.4 vs. 85.1±27.3 N/cm²,P<0.001)。随着足部畸形数量的增加以及足部风险分类的增加,压力也有升高的趋势(P = 0.0001)。峰值压力本身并不是识别高危患者的合适诊断工具。在排除无保护性感觉丧失的患者后,使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析,通过敏感性和特异性的平衡确定的最佳切点为87.5 N/cm²,敏感性为63.5%,特异性为46.3%。
该评估数据继续支持足部压力升高是足部并发症重要危险因素的观点。然而,ROC分析表明,足部压力本身是预测足部溃疡的较差工具。