Petrat Frank, Pindiur Stanislaw, Kirsch Michael, de Groot Herbert
Institut für Physiologische Chemie, Universitätsklinikum, Hufelandstr 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany.
Arch Biochem Biophys. 2003 Apr 15;412(2):207-15. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9861(03)00063-8.
Previously, we demonstrated that mitochondrial NAD(P)H is the primary target of singlet oxygen (1O(2)) generated by photoactivation of mitochondria-selective rhodamine derivatives. Hence, local NAD(P)H oxidation/fluorescence decrease may be used to reveal the site of intracellular 1O(2) generation. Therefore, in addition to the previously used tetramethylrhodamine methylester (TMRM), 2('),4('),5('),7(')-tetrabromorhodamine 123 bromide (TBRB) and rhodamine 123 (Rho 123), we tested here whether mitochondrial NAD(P)H of cultured hepatocytes is directly oxidized upon irradiation of different "mitochondrial" photosensitizers (Photofrin; protoporphyrin IX; Al(III) phthalocyanine chloride tetrasulfonic acid; meso-tetra(4-sulfonatophenyl)porphine dihydrochloride; Visudyne). In contrast to TMRM and Rho 123, which directly oxidized NAD(P)H upon irradiation, irradiation of intracellular TBRB and the photochemical drugs only indirectly affected mitochondrial NAD(P)H due to loss of mitochondrial integrity. In line with this result only TMRM and Rho 123 exclusively localized within the mitochondrial matrix. Due to these results it is doubtful whether real mitochondrial photosensitizers actually exist among the photochemical drugs applicable/used for photodynamic therapy.