Möhlenkamp Stefan, Schmermund Axel, Gerber Thomas C, Kerkhoff Gert, Pump Heiko, Budde Thomas, Erbel Raimund
Klinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Germany.
Herz. 2003 Mar;28(2):106-18. doi: 10.1007/s00059-003-2452-5.
Invasive, selective coronary angiography remains the "gold standard" of direct visualization of epicardial coronary arteries. Technical advances in recent years and improvements in image quality in both electron beam computed tomography (EBT) and multislice spiral/helical computed tomography (MSCT) brought along an increasing interest in the potential clinical role of noninvasive computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA).
Measurement of coronary calcification permits quantitative estimation of overall coronary plaque burden and thereby allows assessment of cardiovascular risk and likelihood of the presence of a significant stenosis. However, the precise site and degree of stenoses cannot be measured. Contrast-enhanced CTCA lumenography permits visualization of epicardial coronary artery stenoses with a sensitivity and specificity of about 90%. Noncalcified plaques may also be detected in individual cases, but very few data are available on this aspect of CTCA. Image artifacts due to rapid motion, especially in the distal segments of the right and circumflex coronary arteries, may preclude reliable assessment of 20-30% of these segments. Also, in-stent restenoses and distal bypass anastomoses will, in the foreseeable future, remain difficult to confidently diagnose by CTCA. Combined assessment of calcified plaque burden and CTCA may enhance diagnostic accuracy especially in patients with low or moderate calcium scores. In the presence of heavy calcifications, stenoses may be masked.
Noninvasive CT-based evaluation of coronary arteries seems useful in patients with a low to intermediate pretest likelihood for significant coronary artery disease (CAD). This holds for several ACC/AHA class II indications described for invasive, selective coronary angiography and for few class I indications. Further prospective studies are required to establish the clinical value of combined assessment of coronary calcium quantification and CTCA.
侵入性选择性冠状动脉造影仍然是直接观察心外膜冠状动脉的“金标准”。近年来的技术进步以及电子束计算机断层扫描(EBT)和多层螺旋/螺旋计算机断层扫描(MSCT)图像质量的提高,使得人们对无创计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影(CTCA)的潜在临床作用越来越感兴趣。
冠状动脉钙化的测量可对总体冠状动脉斑块负荷进行定量评估,从而有助于评估心血管风险以及存在严重狭窄的可能性。然而,无法测量狭窄的精确部位和程度。对比增强CTCA腔造影可显示心外膜冠状动脉狭窄,其敏感性和特异性约为90%。个别情况下也可能检测到非钙化斑块,但关于CTCA这方面的可用数据很少。快速运动引起的图像伪影,尤其是在右冠状动脉和回旋支冠状动脉的远端节段,可能会妨碍对这些节段中20%至30%进行可靠评估。此外,在可预见的未来,通过CTCA仍难以可靠诊断支架内再狭窄和远端旁路吻合情况。钙化斑块负荷与CTCA的联合评估可能会提高诊断准确性,尤其是在钙评分低或中等的患者中。在存在重度钙化的情况下,狭窄可能会被掩盖。
对于冠状动脉疾病(CAD)预测试验可能性低至中等的患者,基于CT的无创冠状动脉评估似乎有用。这适用于侵入性选择性冠状动脉造影所描述的几个美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)II类适应症以及少数I类适应症。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来确定冠状动脉钙定量与CTCA联合评估的临床价值。