Haberl Ralph, Tittus Janine, Böhme Eike, Czernik Andreas, Richartz Barbara Maria, Buck Jürgen, Steinbigler Peter
Klinikum Munich-Pasing, München, Germany.
Am Heart J. 2005 Jun;149(6):1112-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.02.048.
Despite impressive image quality, it is unclear if noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography (CT) is powerful enough to act as a filter before invasive angiography (INV-A) in symptomatic patients.
We therefore studied 133 consecutive symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) and an indication for INV-A (chest pain and signs of ischemia in conventional stress tests). Patients with known CAD, acute coronary syndrome, or a calcium volume score >1000 were excluded. In all patients, both INV-A and multislice CT angiography (MSCT-A) (Philips MX 8000 multislice spiral CT, scan time 250 milliseconds, slice thickness 1.3 mm, 120 mL of contrast agent, 4 mL/s, retrospective gating) were directly compared by 2 independent investigators using the American Heart Association 15-segment model. Altogether, we studied 1596 segments, 74% had diagnostic image quality. Multislice CT angiography correctly identified 68 significant stenoses of the 75 stenoses seen with INV-A (sensitivity 91%). In 945 of 1185 diagnostic segments, stenosis could correctly be ruled out with MSCT-A. There were 3 times more stenoses seen with MSCT-A compared with INV-A (positive predictive value 29%) mainly because of misclassification of nonobstructive plaques as stenosis. The per-patient analysis allowed to exclude significant CAD in 42 (32%) of 133 patients. In only 6 of 53 patients, MSCT-A failed to detect significant stenosis, 4 of those were in small segments not requiring intervention. Calcium scoring alone was less suited as a filter before angiography: 25 patients (18% of study group) had a calcium score = 0, and 8 of these patients turned out to have significant stenoses.
Multislice CT angiography, but not calcium scoring alone, offers promise to reduce the number of INV-A in symptomatic patients with suspected CAD by up to one third with minimal risk for the patient.
尽管多层螺旋计算机断层扫描(CT)冠状动脉造影的图像质量令人印象深刻,但对于有症状的患者,在进行有创血管造影(INV-A)之前,其作为筛选手段的效力是否足够强大尚不清楚。
因此,我们研究了133例连续的有症状且疑似冠心病(CAD)并有INV-A指征(胸痛及传统负荷试验中的缺血迹象)的患者。已知患有CAD、急性冠状动脉综合征或钙积分>1000的患者被排除。所有患者均接受了INV-A和多层CT血管造影(MSCT-A)(飞利浦MX 8000多层螺旋CT,扫描时间250毫秒,层厚1.3毫米,120毫升造影剂,4毫升/秒,回顾性门控),由两名独立研究者使用美国心脏协会15节段模型直接进行比较。我们总共研究了1596个节段,74%具有诊断性图像质量。MSCT-A正确识别出了INV-A所见的75处狭窄中的68处(敏感性91%)。在1185个诊断节段中的945个节段,MSCT-A能够正确排除狭窄。与INV-A相比,MSCT-A发现的狭窄多出3倍(阳性预测值29%),主要原因是非阻塞性斑块被误分类为狭窄。按患者分析,133例患者中有42例(32%)可排除显著CAD。在53例患者中,只有6例MSCT-A未能检测到显著狭窄,其中4例位于无需干预的小节段。单独的钙评分不太适合作为血管造影前的筛选手段:25例患者(研究组的18%)钙评分为0,其中8例患者存在显著狭窄。
多层CT血管造影,而非单独的钙评分,有望将疑似CAD的有症状患者的INV-A数量减少多达三分之一,且对患者的风险最小。