Suppr超能文献

护士与物理治疗师的循证实践比较。

Comparing evidence-based practice of nurses and physiotherapists.

作者信息

Palfreyman Simon, Tod Angela, Doyle Jane

机构信息

Sheffield Vascular Institute, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust.

出版信息

Br J Nurs. 2003;12(4):246-53. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2003.12.4.11165.

Abstract

Evidence-based practice has become an ubiquitous concept within nursing. However, there is little comparative data of nursing with other professions on attitudes to evidence-based practice. This article reports on a survey of nurses' and physiotherapists' sources of knowledge and perceived barriers to evidence-based practice within a large teaching hospital. A total of 324 questionnaires were sent to nurses and physiotherapists. The results showed that both physiotherapists and nurses accessed a wide variety of sources of knowledge. However, nurses were more likely than physiotherapists to use policy and procedure manuals and discussions with medical staff. Both professions have problems with overcoming the barrier of time. Nurses were more likely than physiotherapists to rate themselves as having poor evidence-based practice skills.

摘要

循证实践已成为护理领域中一个普遍存在的概念。然而,关于护理与其他职业对循证实践的态度,几乎没有比较数据。本文报告了一项针对一家大型教学医院内护士和物理治疗师的知识来源以及循证实践中感知到的障碍的调查。共向护士和物理治疗师发放了324份问卷。结果显示,物理治疗师和护士都获取了广泛的知识来源。然而,护士比物理治疗师更有可能使用政策和程序手册,并与医务人员进行讨论。两个职业在克服时间障碍方面都存在问题。护士比物理治疗师更倾向于认为自己的循证实践技能较差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验