Galmiche Jean Paul, Bruley des Varannes Stanislas
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CIC INSERM, CHU Nantes, 44093, Nantes, France.
Lancet. 2003 Mar 29;361(9363):1119-21. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12889-9.
Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a common chronic disorder that has severe impact on quality of life and often requires continuous acid-suppression therapy. Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are extremely effective but expensive, and do not restore the normal antireflux barrier at the gastro-oesophageal junction. Antireflux surgery, even with the laparoscopic approach, has not proven more cost-effective than maintenance therapy with PPIs. Postoperative morbidity is substantial, especially when procedures are done outside expert centres. In the past few years several endoscopic techniques have been developed to treat chronic GORD on an outpatient basis. These techniques include radiofrequency-energy delivery and endoscopic suturing, although other approaches are now under development. STARING POINT: Two prospective open-label studies have recently reported 1-year follow-up of GORD patients treated either by radiofrequency-energy delivery (G Triadafilopoulos and colleagues Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55:149-56) or endoscopic suturing (Z Mahmood and colleagues Gut 2003; 52:34-39). In a US multicentre trial, Triadafilopoulos and colleagues delivered radiofrequency energy to the cardia and distal oesophagus in patients with chronic heartburn, regurgitation or both (the Stretta procedure). All patients were on continuous acid-suppression therapy, but none had severe oesophagitis or hiatus hernia of more than 2 cm. At 12 months, 94 patients available for follow-up showed significant improvement in GORD symptoms, quality of life, and oesophageal acid-exposure. The need for PPI therapy fell from 98% to 30% of patients. In the Mahmood study, 26 similar patients had endoscopic suturing in a single centre. After 1 year, symptoms and quality of life improved and the need for PPIs was reduced to 36% from 100%. In both studies, only minor complications occurred, none of which required specific therapeutic intervention. WHERE NEXT? An effective outpatient procedure to treat chronic GORD would represent a major step forward. However, further studies are needed before an endoscopic approach can be adopted, as none of the published trials are well-controlled studies. Longer follow-up is needed to ensure that relapses do not occur rapidly, complications do not occur more frequently with less skilled operators, or that endoscopic-induced changes do not complicate or compromise subsequent antireflux surgery. Comparative studies of the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic therapy should also include medical strategies such as intermittent or on-demand PPI therapy.
胃食管反流病(GORD)是一种常见的慢性疾病,对生活质量有严重影响,通常需要持续的抑酸治疗。质子泵抑制剂(PPI)极为有效,但价格昂贵,且无法恢复胃食管交界处的正常抗反流屏障。抗反流手术,即使是腹腔镜手术,也未被证明比使用PPI的维持治疗更具成本效益。术后发病率较高,尤其是在非专业中心进行手术时。在过去几年中,已经开发出几种内镜技术用于门诊治疗慢性GORD。这些技术包括射频能量传递和内镜缝合,尽管其他方法也正在研发中。起始点:两项前瞻性开放标签研究最近报告了对接受射频能量传递(G·特里亚达菲利波洛斯及其同事,《胃肠内镜》2002年;55:149 - 56)或内镜缝合(Z·马哈茂德及其同事,《肠道》2003年;52:34 - 39)治疗的GORD患者的1年随访情况。在美国的一项多中心试验中,特里亚达菲利波洛斯及其同事对患有慢性烧心、反流或两者皆有的患者(Stretta手术)的贲门和食管远端施加射频能量。所有患者均接受持续的抑酸治疗,但均无严重食管炎或大于2厘米的食管裂孔疝。在12个月时,94名可进行随访的患者在GORD症状、生活质量和食管酸暴露方面有显著改善。接受PPI治疗的患者需求从98%降至30%。在马哈茂德的研究中,26名类似患者在单一中心接受了内镜缝合。1年后,症状和生活质量得到改善,PPI的需求从100%降至36%。在两项研究中,仅出现了轻微并发症,均无需特殊治疗干预。下一步走向何方?一种有效的门诊治疗慢性GORD的方法将是向前迈出的重要一步。然而,在采用内镜治疗方法之前还需要进一步研究,因为已发表的试验均不是严格对照研究。需要更长时间的随访以确保不会迅速复发、技术不太熟练的操作者不会更频繁地出现并发症,或者内镜引起的改变不会使后续的抗反流手术复杂化或受到影响。内镜治疗成本效益的比较研究还应包括间歇性或按需PPI治疗等医疗策略。