Yang Shuying, Wei Daoyan, Wang Dian, Phimphilai Mattabhorn, Krebsbach Paul H, Franceschi Renny T
Department of Periodontics, Prevention, and Geriatrics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1078, USA.
J Bone Miner Res. 2003 Apr;18(4):705-15. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.4.705.
Bone regeneration requires interactions between a number of factors including bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), growth factors, and transcriptional regulators such as Runx2/Cbfal (Runx2). Because each component may provide a unique contribution to the overall osteogenic response, we hypothesized that bone formation may be enhanced by using combinations of complimentary factors. As an initial test of this concept, interactions between BMP2 and Runx2 were examined using adenovirus-based expression vectors (AdCMV-Runx2, AdCMV-BMP2) in the pluripotent C3H10T1/2 cell line. Cells transduced with AdCMV-Runx2 strongly expressed osteoblast markers, such as alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin, but formed only a weakly mineralized extracellular matrix in vitro, whereas cells transduced with AdCMV-BMP2 exhibited higher levels of mineralization, but only expressed low levels of Runx2 and osteocalcin mRNA. Significantly, when cells were transduced with optimal titers of both viruses, osteoblast differentiation was stimulated to levels that were 10-fold greater than those seen with either AdCMV-Runx2 or AdCMV-BMP2 alone. To measure in vivo osteogenic activity, virally transduced cells were subcutaneously implanted into immunodeficient mice. Cells transduced with control virus produced only fibrous tissue while those with AdCMV-Runx2 produced limited amounts of both cartilage and bone. In contrast, cells transduced with either AdCMV-BMP2 alone or AdCMV-BMP2 plus AdCMV-Cbfal generated large ossicles containing cartilage, bone, and a marrow cavity. However, ossification in the AdCMV-BMP2 plus AdCMV-Cbfal group was more extensive in that both mineral content and fractional bone area were greater than that seen in the AdCMV-BMP2 group. Thus, the increased osteoblast differentiation observed with combined adenovirus treatment in vitro is also manifested by increased bone formation in vivo. These results suggest that Runx2 and BMP2 have distinct, but complementary, roles in osteogenesis and that their combined actions may be necessary for optimal bone formation.
骨再生需要多种因素之间的相互作用,包括骨形态发生蛋白(BMP)、生长因子以及转录调节因子,如Runx2/Cbfal(Runx2)。由于每个成分可能对整体成骨反应有独特的贡献,我们推测通过使用互补因子的组合可能会增强骨形成。作为对这一概念的初步测试,我们在多能C3H10T1/2细胞系中使用基于腺病毒的表达载体(AdCMV-Runx2、AdCMV-BMP2)研究了BMP2和Runx2之间的相互作用。用AdCMV-Runx2转导的细胞强烈表达成骨细胞标志物,如碱性磷酸酶和骨钙素,但在体外仅形成弱矿化的细胞外基质,而用AdCMV-BMP2转导的细胞表现出更高水平的矿化,但仅表达低水平的Runx2和骨钙素mRNA。值得注意的是,当用两种病毒的最佳滴度转导细胞时,成骨细胞分化被刺激到比单独使用AdCMV-Runx2或AdCMV-BMP2高出10倍的水平。为了测量体内成骨活性,将病毒转导的细胞皮下植入免疫缺陷小鼠体内。用对照病毒转导的细胞仅产生纤维组织,而用AdCMV-Runx2转导的细胞产生有限量的软骨和骨。相比之下,单独用AdCMV-BMP2或AdCMV-BMP2加AdCMV-Cbfal转导的细胞产生含有软骨、骨和骨髓腔的大骨块。然而,AdCMV-BMP2加AdCMV-Cbfal组的骨化更广泛,因为矿物质含量和骨面积分数均大于AdCMV-BMP2组。因此,体外联合腺病毒处理观察到的成骨细胞分化增加在体内也表现为骨形成增加。这些结果表明,Runx2和BMP2在骨生成中具有不同但互补的作用,它们的联合作用可能是最佳骨形成所必需的。