五因素模型的跨文化复制以及荷兰精神病样本中NEO-PI-R和MMPI-2 PSY-5量表的比较。

Cross-cultural replication of the five-factor model and comparison of the NEO-PI-R and MMPI-2 PSY-5 scales in a Dutch psychiatric sample.

作者信息

Egger Jos I M, De Mey Hubert R A, Derksen Jan J L, van der Staak Cees P F

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology and Personality, University of Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2003 Mar;15(1):81-8. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.15.1.81.

DOI:10.1037/1040-3590.15.1.81

PMID:12674727

Abstract

The authors investigated cross-cultural replicability of the five-factor model (FFM) of personality as represented by the revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R; P. T. Costa & R. R. McCrae, 1992) in a sample of 423 Dutch psychiatric patients. Also, NEO-PI-R domain scales were compared with the Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5; A. R. Harkness & J. L. McNulty, 1994) scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (J. N. Butcher, W. G. Dahlstrom, J. R. Graham, A. Tellegen, & B. Kaemmer, 2002). Principal-components analysis with procrustean rotation confirmed the hypothesized structural similarity of the present sample with the U.S. normative factor scores. All of the hypothesized relations between NEO-PI-R and PSY-5 scales were confirmed. The results provide evidence for cross-cultural replicability of the FFM and for validity of the NEO-PI-R and PSY-5 constructs in the psychological assessment of psychiatric patients.

摘要

作者以423名荷兰精神病患者为样本，研究了由修订版《NEO人格量表》（NEO-PI-R；P.T. 科斯塔和R.R. 麦克雷，1992年）所代表的人格五因素模型（FFM）的跨文化可重复性。此外，还将NEO-PI-R领域量表与明尼苏达多相人格问卷-2（J.N. 布彻、W.G. 达尔斯特伦、J.R. 格雷厄姆、A. 泰勒根和B. 凯默，2002年）的人格心理病理学五因素量表（PSY-5；A.R. 哈克尼斯和J.L. 麦克纳尔蒂，1994年）进行了比较。采用普罗克汝斯忒斯旋转的主成分分析证实了本样本与美国常模因子得分在假设的结构相似性。NEO-PI-R和PSY-5量表之间所有假设的关系都得到了证实。研究结果为FFM的跨文化可重复性以及NEO-PI-R和PSY-5结构在精神病患者心理评估中的有效性提供了证据。