Morasco Benjamin J, Gfeller Jeffrey D, Elder Katherine A
Behavioral Health and Clinical Neurosciences Division, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA.
J Pers Assess. 2007 Jun;88(3):276-83. doi: 10.1080/00223890701293924.
In this psychometric study, we compared the recently developed Validity Scales from the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992b) with the MMPI-2 (Butcher, Dahstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) Validity Scales. We collected data from clients (n = 74) who completed comprehensive psychological evaluations at a university-based outpatient mental health clinic. Correlations between the Validity Scales of the NEO-PI-R and MMPI-2 were significant and in the expected directions. The relationships provide support for convergent and discriminant validity of the NEO-PI-R Validity Scales. The percent agreement of invalid responding on the two measures was high, although the diagnostic agreement was modest (kappa = .22-.33). Finally, clients who responded in an invalid manner on the NEO-PI-R Validity Scales produced significantly different clinical profiles on the NEO-PI-R and MMPI-2 than clients with valid protocols. These results provide additional support for the clinical utility of the NEO-PI-R Validity Scales as indicators of response bias.
在这项心理测量学研究中，我们将最新编制的《修订版NEO人格问卷》（NEO PI-R；科斯塔和麦克雷，1992b）中的效度量表与明尼苏达多相人格测验第二版（MMPI-2；布彻、达斯特罗姆、格雷厄姆、泰勒根和凯默，1989）的效度量表进行了比较。我们从在一家大学门诊心理健康诊所完成全面心理评估的客户（n = 74）中收集了数据。NEO-PI-R和MMPI-2效度量表之间的相关性显著且符合预期方向。这些关系为NEO-PI-R效度量表的聚合效度和区分效度提供了支持。两种测量方法中无效作答的百分比一致性很高，尽管诊断一致性一般（卡帕系数 = 0.22 - 0.33）。最后，在NEO-PI-R效度量表上作答无效的客户，与作答有效的客户相比，在NEO-PI-R和MMPI-2上呈现出显著不同的临床概况。这些结果为NEO-PI-R效度量表作为反应偏差指标的临床效用提供了更多支持。
