• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[因动脉瘤破裂导致的蛛网膜下腔出血,选择神经外科手术还是血管内治疗?如有疑问,选择血管内治疗]

[Neurosurgery or endovascular treatment for subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured aneurysm? In case of doubt choose endovascular treatment].

作者信息

Vermeulen M, Bosch D A, van Rooij W J J

机构信息

Afd. Neurologie, Academisch Medisch Centrum/Universiteit van Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Mar 15;147(11):477-9.

PMID:12677944
Abstract

In the 'International subarachnoid aneurysm trial' (ISAT), patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms were randomised to endovascular detachable coil treatment or craniotomy with clipping of the aneurysm if either treatment was judged to be suitable. Of all patients assessed for eligibility, endovascular treatment was considered the best treatment for 29% and neurosurgical clipping was considered best for 38%, in 11% the treatment was unknown, which left 22% for whom there was no preference for one of the two treatments and who gave permission for randomisation. In patients allocated endovascular treatment, 24% was dependent or dead at 1 year versus 31% of patients allocated neurosurgical treatment. The relative-risk reduction in dependency or death at 1 year was 23%. The risk of re-bleeding after 1 year was 2 per 1276 patient years in patients allocated endovascular treatment and 0 per 1081 patient years in those allocated neurosurgical treatment. Based on these results it is estimated that in the Netherlands each year at least 500 patients with a ruptured intracranial aneurysm should be treated with endovascular coiling within 3 days of the haemorrhage. This treatment can best be limited to a few centres, since it will otherwise not be possible to gain sufficient experience. The same applies to neurosurgical treatment since the number of patients treated with neurosurgical clipping will decrease.

摘要

在“国际蛛网膜下腔动脉瘤试验”(ISAT)中,颅内动脉瘤破裂患者被随机分配接受血管内可脱性弹簧圈治疗或开颅夹闭动脉瘤,前提是两种治疗方法都被判定为合适。在所有评估是否符合条件的患者中,29%的患者被认为血管内治疗是最佳治疗方法,38%的患者被认为神经外科夹闭是最佳治疗方法,11%的患者治疗方法未知,剩下22%的患者对两种治疗方法无偏好并同意随机分组。接受血管内治疗的患者中,1年后有24%出现依赖或死亡,而接受神经外科治疗的患者这一比例为31%。1年后依赖或死亡的相对风险降低了23%。接受血管内治疗的患者每1276患者年有2例1年后再出血,接受神经外科治疗的患者每1081患者年为0例。基于这些结果,据估计在荷兰每年至少有500例颅内动脉瘤破裂患者应在出血后3天内接受血管内弹簧圈栓塞治疗。这种治疗最好限于少数几个中心,否则将无法获得足够的经验。神经外科治疗也是如此,因为接受神经外科夹闭治疗的患者数量将会减少。

相似文献

1
[Neurosurgery or endovascular treatment for subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured aneurysm? In case of doubt choose endovascular treatment].[因动脉瘤破裂导致的蛛网膜下腔出血,选择神经外科手术还是血管内治疗?如有疑问,选择血管内治疗]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Mar 15;147(11):477-9.
2
International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial.对2143例颅内动脉瘤破裂患者进行神经外科夹闭术与血管内栓塞术对比的国际蛛网膜下腔动脉瘤试验(ISAT):一项随机试验。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2002 Nov-Dec;11(6):304-14. doi: 10.1053/jscd.2002.130390.
3
The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT).破裂性脑动脉瘤血管内栓塞与神经外科夹闭术的耐久性:国际蛛网膜下腔动脉瘤试验(ISAT)英国队列的18年随访
Lancet. 2015 Feb 21;385(9969):691-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60975-2. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
4
International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial.2143例颅内动脉瘤破裂患者神经外科夹闭术与血管内栓塞术的国际蛛网膜下腔动脉瘤试验(ISAT):一项随机试验。
Lancet. 2002 Oct 26;360(9342):1267-74. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11314-6.
5
Endovascular embolization vs surgical clipping in treatment of cerebral aneurysms: morbidity and mortality with short-term outcome.血管内栓塞术与外科夹闭术治疗脑动脉瘤的比较:发病率、死亡率及短期预后
Surg Neurol. 2006 Sep;66(3):277-84; discussion 284. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2005.12.031.
6
International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion.颅内破裂动脉瘤的神经外科夹闭术与血管内栓塞术的国际蛛网膜下腔动脉瘤试验(ISAT):2143例患者的生存、依赖、癫痫发作、再出血、亚组及动脉瘤闭塞效果的随机对照研究
Lancet. 2005;366(9488):809-17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67214-5.
7
Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.血管内栓塞术与神经外科夹闭术治疗动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 15;8(8):CD003085. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003085.pub3.
8
Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: our approach.颅内动脉瘤破裂的治疗:我们的方法。
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2005 Dec;48(6):325-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-915633.
9
German Society of Neurosurgery Section on Vascular Neurosurgery: Position Statement on the International Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Trial (ISAT).德国神经外科学会血管神经外科学分会:关于国际蛛网膜下腔出血试验(ISAT)的立场声明。
Zentralbl Neurochir. 2003;64(3):99-103. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41879.
10
Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up.国际蛛网膜下腔动脉瘤试验(ISAT)中颅内动脉瘤夹闭或血管内栓塞术后再发蛛网膜下腔出血、死亡或依赖的风险及标准化死亡率:长期随访
Lancet Neurol. 2009 May;8(5):427-33. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70080-8. Epub 2009 Mar 28.