Schrag Stephanie J, Fiore Anthony E, Gonik Bernard, Malik Tasneem, Reef Susan, Singleton James A, Schuchat Anne, Schulkin Jay
National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, 30333, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Apr;101(4):704-10. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00010-3.
To assist efforts to improve adult vaccination coverage by characterizing vaccination and infectious disease screening practices of obstetrician-gynecologists.
A written survey of demographics, attitudes, and practices was mailed to 1063 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Fellows, including the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network (n = 413) and 650 randomly sampled Fellows.
Seventy-four percent of Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network members and 44% of nonmembers responded. A majority (Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network members: 60%; nonmembers: 49%) considered themselves primary care providers. Fewer than 60% routinely obtained patient vaccination or infection histories. Most screened prenatal patients for hepatitis B surface antigen (89%) and rubella immunoglobulin G antibody (85%). Sixty-four percent worked in practices that offered at least one vaccine; the most common were rubella (52%) and influenza (50%). Ten percent worked in practices that offered all major vaccines recommended for pregnant or postpartum women. Despite recommendations to provide influenza vaccine to pregnant women during influenza season, only 44% did so; among those who did not, 14% reported a belief that pregnant women do not need influenza vaccine. Provision of vaccine was associated with working in a multispecialty practice (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6, 4.1) and identifying as a primary care provider (adjusted OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.3, 2.7). The most common reasons for not offering vaccines were cost (44%) and a belief that vaccines should be provided elsewhere (41%).
The high proportion of obstetrician-gynecologists who do not offer vaccines or screen for vaccine and infection histories suggests missed opportunities for prevention of maternal and neonatal infections.
通过描述妇产科医生的疫苗接种和传染病筛查行为,助力提高成人疫苗接种覆盖率。
向1063名美国妇产科医师学会会员邮寄了一份关于人口统计学、态度和行为的书面调查问卷,其中包括协作门诊研究网络(n = 413)的成员以及650名随机抽取的会员。
协作门诊研究网络成员的回复率为74%,非成员的回复率为44%。大多数人(协作门诊研究网络成员:60%;非成员:49%)将自己视为初级保健提供者。常规获取患者疫苗接种或感染史的人数不到60%。大多数人对产前患者进行乙肝表面抗原(89%)和风疹免疫球蛋白G抗体(85%)筛查。64%的人所在的医疗机构提供至少一种疫苗;最常见的是风疹疫苗(52%)和流感疫苗(50%)。10%的人所在的医疗机构提供所有推荐给孕妇或产后妇女的主要疫苗。尽管建议在流感季节为孕妇提供流感疫苗,但只有44%的人这样做了;在未这样做的人中,14%表示认为孕妇不需要流感疫苗。提供疫苗与在多专科医疗机构工作(调整后的优势比[OR]为2.6,95%置信区间[CI]为1.6,4.1)以及自认为是初级保健提供者(调整后的OR为1.9;95%CI为1.3,2.7)有关。不提供疫苗的最常见原因是成本(44%)以及认为疫苗应在其他地方提供(41%)。
不提供疫苗或不筛查疫苗接种和感染史的妇产科医生比例较高,这表明在预防孕产妇和新生儿感染方面存在错失的机会。