Borst A, Theelen B, Reinders E, Boekhout T, Fluit A C, Savelkoul P H M
Eijkman-Winkler Center for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Inflammation, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Apr;41(4):1357-62. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.4.1357-1362.2003.
Non-Candida albicans Candida species are increasingly being isolated. These species show differences in levels of resistance to antimycotic agents and mortality. Therefore, it is important to be able to correctly identify the causative organism to the species level. Identification of C. dubliniensis in particular remains problematic due to the high degree of phenotypic similarity between this species and C. albicans. The use of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis as an identification method for medically important Candida species was investigated. Our results show very clear differences among medically important Candida species. Furthermore, when screening a large collection of clinical isolates previously identified on CHROMagar as C. albicans, we found a misidentification rate of 6%. AFLP analysis is universally applicable, and the patterns can easily be stored in a general, accessible database. Therefore, AFLP might prove to be a reliable method for the identification of medically important Candida species.
非白色念珠菌属念珠菌的分离率日益增加。这些菌种在对抗真菌药物的耐药水平和死亡率方面存在差异。因此,能够将致病微生物准确鉴定到种水平非常重要。由于都柏林念珠菌与白色念珠菌之间存在高度的表型相似性,对其进行鉴定尤其存在问题。我们研究了使用扩增片段长度多态性(AFLP)分析作为医学上重要念珠菌种的鉴定方法。我们的结果显示,医学上重要的念珠菌种之间存在非常明显的差异。此外,在筛查大量先前在显色培养基上鉴定为白色念珠菌的临床分离株时,我们发现错误鉴定率为6%。AFLP分析具有普遍适用性,其图谱可以轻松存储在一个通用的、可访问的数据库中。因此,AFLP可能被证明是一种鉴定医学上重要念珠菌种的可靠方法。