Bondesson Asa, Midlöv Patrik, Eriksson Tommy, Höglund Peter
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Lund University Hospital, 221 85 Lund, Sweden.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 May;59(1):65-9. doi: 10.1007/s00228-003-0583-5. Epub 2003 Apr 1.
The objective of this study was to assess the opinions of the general practitioners (GPs) and nurses towards a previous pharmacotherapeutic intervention and their opinions towards future alternative or complementary methods to improve nursing-home patients' drug treatments.
Sixty-six GPs and forty-five nursing-home nurses, working at nursing homes in southern Sweden, were sent a questionnaire to assess their opinions towards a pharmacotherapeutic intervention conducted by a multi-specialty team and their opinions on alternative or complementary future methods potentially improving patient treatment.
The response rate was 62% for the GPs and 69% for the nurses. Both GPs and nurses were positive towards further co-operation regarding pharmacotherapeutic interventions. All nurses that were positive to further co-operation wished to do it in a multidisciplinary team, whereas some GPs wished to do this in a multi-specialty team.
The opinions of GPs and nurses towards the pharmacotherapeutic intervention indicate that this or similar methods may successfully be used in clinical practice for improving drug therapy.
本研究的目的是评估全科医生（GPs）和护士对先前药物治疗干预措施的看法，以及他们对未来改善疗养院患者药物治疗的替代或补充方法的看法。
向瑞典南部疗养院工作的66名全科医生和45名疗养院护士发送了一份问卷，以评估他们对多专业团队进行的药物治疗干预措施的看法，以及他们对未来可能改善患者治疗的替代或补充方法的看法。
全科医生的回复率为62%，护士的回复率为69%。全科医生和护士都对在药物治疗干预方面进一步合作持积极态度。所有对进一步合作持积极态度的护士都希望在多学科团队中进行，而一些全科医生希望在多专业团队中进行。
全科医生和护士对药物治疗干预措施的看法表明，这种或类似方法可能在临床实践中成功用于改善药物治疗。
