Aronson Sari Gilman, Kirby Robert W
Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2002 Dec;5(6):916-9. doi: 10.1089/10966210260499131.
Many physicians and patients do not discuss care at the end of life and most practicing physicians have had little formal education concerning end-of-life discussions. To address this deficiency, our internal medicine residency faculty participated in the National End of Life Residency Education Project and implemented a series of educational initiatives including an advance directives Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). The 20-minute station assessed knowledge about the key issues that differentiate types of advance directives; and communication issues that arise when discussing advance directives. OSCE results revealed that most residents readily learned to differentiate types of advance directives, appreciated fear and psychosocial factors as barriers to communication, and emphasized that do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders did not mean a lack of treatment. Residents had difficulty discussing the influence of coping style and psychological defensiveness on behavior, and recognizing that patient's thoughts and concerns about dying or DNR orders might influence end of life wishes and behavior. The Advance Directives OSCE is a useful initial assessment of knowledge and ability to address basic end of life issues.
许多医生和患者不会讨论临终关怀问题,而且大多数执业医生几乎没有接受过关于临终讨论的正规教育。为了弥补这一不足,我们内科住院医师培训教员参与了全国临终住院医师教育项目,并实施了一系列教育举措,包括一项预先指示客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)。这个20分钟的考站评估了关于区分不同类型预先指示的关键问题的知识,以及讨论预先指示时出现的沟通问题。OSCE结果显示,大多数住院医师很容易学会区分不同类型的预先指示,认识到恐惧和心理社会因素是沟通的障碍,并强调不要复苏(DNR)医嘱并不意味着缺乏治疗。住院医师在讨论应对方式和心理防御对行为的影响,以及认识到患者对死亡或DNR医嘱的想法和担忧可能会影响临终愿望和行为方面存在困难。预先指示OSCE是对处理基本临终问题的知识和能力的一项有用的初步评估。