Suppr超能文献

持续撤机失败时的无创通气:一项随机对照试验。

Noninvasive ventilation during persistent weaning failure: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Ferrer Miquel, Esquinas Antonio, Arancibia Francisco, Bauer Torsten Thomas, Gonzalez Gumersindo, Carrillo Andres, Rodriguez-Roisin Robert, Torres Antoni

机构信息

UVIR, Institut Clinic de Pneumologia i Cirurgia Toracica, Hospital Clinic, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Jul 1;168(1):70-6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200209-1074OC. Epub 2003 Apr 10.

Abstract

To assess the efficacy of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in patients with persistent weaning failure, we conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in 43 mechanically ventilated patients who had failed a weaning trial for 3 consecutive days. This trial was stopped after a planned interim analysis. Patients were randomly extubated, receiving NIV (n = 21), or remained intubated following a conventional-weaning approach consisting of daily weaning attempts (n = 22). Compared with the conventional-weaning group, the noninvasive-ventilation group had shorter periods of invasive ventilation (through tracheal intubation) (9.5 +/- 8.3 vs. 20.1 +/- 13.1 days, p = 0.003) and intensive care unit (ICU) (14.1 +/- 9.2 vs. 25.0 +/- 12.5 days, p = 0.002) and hospital stays (27.8 +/- 14.6 vs. 40.8 +/- 21.4 days, p = 0.026), less need for tracheotomy to withdraw ventilation (1, 5% vs. 13, 59%, p < 0.001), lower incidence of nosocomial pneumonia (5, 24% vs. 13, 59%, p = 0.042) and septic shock (2, 10% vs. 9, 41%, p = 0.045), and increased ICU (19, 90% vs. 13, 59%, p = 0.045) and 90-day survival (p = 0.044). The conventional-weaning approach was an independent risk factor of decreased ICU (odds ratio: 6.6; p = 0.035) and 90-day survival (odds ratio: 3.5; p = 0.018). Earlier extubation with NIV results in shorter mechanical ventilation and length of stay, less need for tracheotomy, lower incidence of complications, and improved survival in these patients.

摘要

为评估无创通气(NIV)对持续撤机失败患者的疗效,我们对43例机械通气且撤机试验连续失败3天的患者进行了一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。在计划的中期分析后,该试验提前终止。患者被随机分为两组,一组接受无创通气并随即拔管(n = 21),另一组采用包括每日撤机尝试的传统撤机方法并继续插管(n = 22)。与传统撤机组相比,无创通气组的有创通气(通过气管插管)时间(9.5±8.3天 vs. 20.1±13.1天,p = 0.003)、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(14.1±9.2天 vs. 25.0±12.5天,p = 0.002)和住院时间(27.8±14.6天 vs. 40.8±21.4天,p = 0.026)均较短,撤机时气管切开需求较少(1例,5% vs. 3例,13.59%,p < 0.001),医院获得性肺炎(5例,24% vs. 3例,13.59%,p = 0.042)和感染性休克(2例,10% vs. 2例,9.41%,p = 0.045)的发生率较低,ICU生存率(19例,90% vs. 13例,59%,p = 0.045)和90天生存率提高(p = 0.044)。传统撤机方法是ICU生存率降低(比值比:6.6;p = 0.035)和90天生存率降低(比值比:3.5;p = 0.018)的独立危险因素。早期采用无创通气撤机可缩短机械通气时间和住院时间,减少气管切开需求,降低并发症发生率,并提高这些患者的生存率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验