Department of Respiratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P. R. China.
Anesth Analg. 2012 Sep;115(3):597-604. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31825c7dba. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
Tracheotomy patients who are difficult to wean from ventilation consume a substantial portion of intensive care unit (ICU) resources. These patients also typically undergo a long period of mechanical ventilation (MV) and have a high mortality rate. The efficacy of a dual-mode weaning strategy (alternation of invasive and noninvasive MV) in tracheotomy patients who are difficult to wean is unknown.
We performed this prospective, randomized, controlled trial in a 17-bed respiratory ICU from July 2009 to October 2011. After tracheotomy, patients who failed for 3 consecutive days in a spontaneous breathing trial were enrolled (n = 32) and randomly allocated to either the dual-mode (n = 15) or conventional (n = 17) weaning group.
Compared with the conventional group, patients in the dual-mode group had a shorter duration of MV during the entire study (median 38 days, interquartile range [IQR]: 28-53 vs 59, IQR: 39-88, P = 0.03) and after randomization (median 10 days, IQR: 4-21 vs 37, IQR: 16-51, P < 0.01). They also had a shorter ICU stay (median 44 days, IQR: 32-54 vs 72, IQR: 52-102, P = 0.01), a lower mortality rate during weaning (1 of 15 vs 7 of 17, P = 0.04), and a lower rate of pulmonary infection after randomization (3 of 15 vs 12 of 17, P < 0.01).
Dual-mode weaning is a promising strategy for treating tracheotomy patients who are difficult to wean. In a small cohort of patients with tracheotomies, we demonstrated that dual-mode weaning reduced the total duration of MV and ICU stay; we recommend additional studies to assess its effect on pulmonary infections and mortality.
气管切开患者在脱离呼吸机方面存在困难,耗费了大量重症监护病房(ICU)资源。这些患者通常需要接受长时间的机械通气(MV),且死亡率较高。双模式撤机策略(有创与无创 MV 交替)对气管切开困难撤机患者的疗效尚不明确。
我们于 2009 年 7 月至 2011 年 10 月在 17 张床位的呼吸 ICU 进行了这项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。气管切开后,连续 3 天自主呼吸试验失败的患者(n=32)入组并随机分配至双模式(n=15)或常规(n=17)撤机组。
与常规组相比,双模式组患者在整个研究期间(中位 38 天,四分位距[IQR]:28-53 与 59,IQR:39-88,P=0.03)和随机分组后(中位 10 天,IQR:4-21 与 37,IQR:16-51,P<0.01)的 MV 时间更短。双模式组患者 ICU 住院时间更短(中位 44 天,IQR:32-54 与 72,IQR:52-102,P=0.01),撤机期间死亡率更低(1/15 与 7/17,P=0.04),且随机分组后肺部感染发生率更低(3/15 与 12/17,P<0.01)。
双模式撤机策略有望用于治疗气管切开困难撤机患者。在这项气管切开患者的小队列研究中,我们发现双模式撤机减少了 MV 总时间和 ICU 住院时间;我们建议开展更多研究评估其对肺部感染和死亡率的影响。