Nishigawa Keisuke, Kondo Kazuo, Takeuchi Hisahiro, Clark Glenn T
Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Apr;89(4):412-7. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.82.
No effective method has been found to fully control sleep bruxism, although contingent feedback methods show some promise.
This demonstration-of-concept study evaluated the effect of contingent electrical lip stimulation on sleep bruxism.
Recordings of masseter muscle activity were performed over 5 nights in 7 subjects with acknowledged bruxism and dental attrition (5 men, 2 women). A small electrical switch, activated with light force clenching, was mounted between 2 occlusal orthotics. This switch triggered a stimulator, which delivered slightly noxious electrical pulses to the subject's lip. After a baseline first night recording session, stimulation was delivered in 1-hour blocks for half of each sleep period during nights 2 through 5. Paired t tests (alpha = 0.05) were conducted on 4 recorded bruxism parameters.
With stimulation, the number (+/-SD) of events/hour reduced from a baseline level of 3.9 +/- 2.0 to 2.4 +/- 0.8 and the mean amplitude (% maximum voluntary contraction) reduced from 28.7 +/- 20.0 to 17.6 +/- 4.1. There was a mean decrease in the duration (s/event) from 10.6 +/- 1.4 to 9.1 +/- 2.5 and the total event time (s/hour) was reduced from 41.7 +/- 22.4 to 23.2 +/- 11.0. Among these measures, bruxism events with and without stimulation were compared, and only the duration of individual bruxism events (s/event) showed a significant change (P=.038). Finally, no subject reported being awakened from sleep by the stimulation.
The reductions in bruxism events were noteworthy, especially considering that stimulation was delivered for only half of the sleeping period.
尽管偶然反馈方法显示出一定前景,但尚未找到能完全控制睡眠磨牙症的有效方法。
本概念验证研究评估了偶然电唇刺激对睡眠磨牙症的影响。
对7名患有公认磨牙症和牙齿磨损的受试者(5名男性,2名女性)进行了5晚的咬肌活动记录。一个通过轻微用力咬紧激活的小型电开关安装在两个咬合矫正器之间。该开关触发一个刺激器,向受试者的嘴唇发送轻微有害的电脉冲。在第一晚进行基线记录后,在第2至5晚的每个睡眠时段的一半时间内,以1小时为单位进行刺激。对4个记录的磨牙症参数进行配对t检验(α = 0.05)。
通过刺激,每小时事件数(±标准差)从基线水平的3.9±2.0降至2.4±0.8,平均幅度(最大自主收缩百分比)从28.7±20.0降至17.6±4.1。持续时间(秒/事件)平均从10.6±1.4降至9.1±2.5,总事件时间(秒/小时)从41.7±22.4降至23.2±11.0。在这些测量中,比较了有刺激和无刺激时的磨牙症事件,只有单个磨牙症事件的持续时间(秒/事件)显示出显著变化(P = 0.038)。最后,没有受试者报告因刺激而从睡眠中醒来。
磨牙症事件的减少值得注意,特别是考虑到刺激仅在睡眠时间的一半进行。