Yamaguchi Ken, Levine William N, Marra Guido, Galatz Leesa M, Klepps Steven, Flatow Evan L
Shoulder and Elbow Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Instr Course Lect. 2003;52:81-92.
There has been much recent enthusiasm regarding complete arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, and it is becoming apparent that, for many, this newer technique may be a preferable alternative to the more traditional mini-open rotator cuff repair. Several short-term studies have demonstrated that complete arthroscopic repair has excellent results comparable with those of mini-open repair, which is also an excellent technique. The choice of which procedure may be better for an individual patient or surgeon can be based on a variety of considerations, including the patient's expectations, the pathoanatomy of the cuff, and the surgical experience of the surgeon. The relative merits and disadvantages of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair are discussed on the basis of those considerations. When a surgeon is deciding which procedure to perform, it is important that the basic principles of rotator cuff repair not be compromised and that he or she perform the procedure that is most reproducible given his or her level of experience; however, for those who are now utilizing miniopen repair, arthroscopic repair may have important advantages and may be worth pursuing in the future. If a surgeon chooses to obtain the skills necessary to perform a complete arthroscopic repair, performance of the mini-open procedure offers an excellent opportunity to make an orderly transition.
最近,对于完全关节镜下肩袖修复术有诸多热情,而且越来越明显的是,对于许多人来说,这种新技术可能是比更传统的小切口开放肩袖修复术更可取的选择。几项短期研究表明,完全关节镜下修复术的效果极佳,可与小切口开放修复术相媲美,而小切口开放修复术也是一种出色的技术。对于个体患者或外科医生而言,哪种手术方式可能更好,可基于多种因素来选择,包括患者的期望、肩袖的病理解剖结构以及外科医生的手术经验。基于这些因素,讨论了关节镜下肩袖修复术的相对优缺点。当外科医生决定进行哪种手术时,重要的是肩袖修复的基本原则不能受到损害,并且他或她要根据自己的经验水平进行最可重复的手术;然而,对于那些目前正在采用小切口开放修复术的医生来说,关节镜下修复术可能具有重要优势,并且在未来可能值得尝试。如果外科医生选择掌握进行完全关节镜下修复所需的技能,那么进行小切口开放手术是实现有序过渡的绝佳机会。