• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A comparison of full arthroscopic and arthroscopic-assisted mini-open repair methods in rotator cuff tears 1-3 cm in size.1-3厘米大小肩袖撕裂的全关节镜与关节镜辅助小切口修复方法比较
J Orthop. 2018 Aug 22;15(3):894-898. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.08.011. eCollection 2018 Sep.
2
Better short-term outcomes of mini-open rotator cuff repair compared to full arthroscopic repair.与全关节镜修复相比，小切口肩袖修复的短期疗效更佳。
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2024 Jun;27(2):212-218. doi: 10.5397/cise.2023.00745. Epub 2024 May 13.
3
Arthroscopic versus Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair: Should We Ignore the Mini-Open Surgery?关节镜与小切口开放肩袖修复术：我们是否应该忽视小切口手术？
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2021;88(5):369-374.
4
Arthroscopic versus mini-open salvage repair of the rotator cuff tear: outcome analysis at 2 to 6 years' follow-up.关节镜下与小切口挽救性修复肩袖撕裂：2至6年随访结果分析
Arthroscopy. 2003 Sep;19(7):746-54. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(03)00395-5.
5
A randomized clinical trial comparing open to arthroscopic acromioplasty with mini-open rotator cuff repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears: disease-specific quality of life outcome at an average 2-year follow-up.一项随机临床试验，比较开放性与关节镜下肩峰成形术联合小切口肩袖修补术治疗全层肩袖撕裂的效果：平均2年随访时的疾病特异性生活质量结果
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1043-51. doi: 10.1177/0363546508314409. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
6
All-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: A long-term retrospective outcome comparison.全关节镜与小切口开放性肩袖修复术：长期回顾性疗效比较
Arthroscopy. 2003 Mar;19(3):234-8. doi: 10.1053/jars.2003.50036.
7
Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a comparison of clinical outcome.关节镜下与小切口开放性肩袖修复术：临床结果比较
Arthroscopy. 2005 Dec;21(12):1415-20. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.09.008.
8
[Massive tears of the rotator cuff--comparison of mini-open and arthroscopic techniques. Part 2. Arthroscopic repair].[肩袖巨大撕裂——小切口开放手术与关节镜技术的比较。第2部分。关节镜修复]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007 Oct;74(5):318-25.
9
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [the UK Rotator Cuff Surgery (UKUFF) randomised trial].开放性与关节镜下肩袖修复术的临床疗效及成本效益[英国肩袖手术（UKUFF）随机试验]
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Oct;19(80):1-218. doi: 10.3310/hta19800.
10
A comparison of arthroscopic and open rotator cuff repair.关节镜下与开放性肩袖修复术的比较
Arthroscopy. 2005 Sep;21(9):1090-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.05.010.

引用本文的文献

1
[Functional comparison between arthroscopy and open surgery for rotator cuff injuries].[关节镜手术与开放性手术治疗肩袖损伤的功能比较]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Sep 18;61(Suppl 2):S350-S355.
2
Comparison of Locking-Loop Suture Bridge Repair and Single-Row Suture Anchor Repair in Small to Medium Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Cohort Study With Clinical and Ultrasound Evaluations.小至中型肩袖撕裂的锁定环缝线桥修复与单排缝线锚钉修复的比较：一项包含临床和超声评估的前瞻性队列研究
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Jan 5;11(1):23259671221142242. doi: 10.1177/23259671221142242. eCollection 2023 Jan.
3
Update on all-arthroscopic vs. mini-open rotator cuff repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.全关节镜与小切口开放修复肩袖损伤的最新进展：一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Orthop. 2021 Mar 27;24:254-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.03.009. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcome in all-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair in small to medium-sized tears: a randomized controlled trial in 100 patients with 1-year follow-up.关节镜下与小切口修复小型至中型肩袖撕裂的临床疗效比较：一项 100 例患者随机对照研究，随访 1 年。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Feb;29(2):266-73. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.08.022. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
2
Early outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a matched comparison with mini-open rotator cuff repair.关节镜下肩袖修补术的早期疗效：与小切口开放肩袖修补术的配对比较
Arthroscopy. 2007 Jun;23(6):573-82, 582.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.01.011.
3
All-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a retrospective review with minimum 2-year follow-up.全关节镜与小切口开放修复肩袖损伤：一项至少随访2年的回顾性研究。
Arthroscopy. 2006 Jun;22(6):587-94. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.01.019.
4
Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a comparison of clinical outcome.关节镜下与小切口开放性肩袖修复术：临床结果比较
Arthroscopy. 2005 Dec;21(12):1415-20. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.09.008.
5
Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.关节镜下与小切口肩袖修补术：临床疗效与患者满意度比较
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Sep-Oct;14(5):455-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.02.002.
6
[All arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tears].[肩袖撕裂的全关节镜治疗]
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2003;37 Suppl 1:93-104.
7
Transitioning to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: the pros and cons.向关节镜下肩袖修复术的转变：利弊分析
Instr Course Lect. 2003;52:81-92.
8
[Arthroscopic-assisted mini-open rotator cuff repair].关节镜辅助下小切口肩袖修补术
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2002;36(1):1-6.
9
Structural factors affecting the outcome of rotator cuff repair.影响肩袖修复结果的结构因素
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 May-Jun;11(3):212-8. doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.122272.
10
Outcome of rotator cuff repair.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 May-Jun;11(3):201-11. doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.122271.

1-3厘米大小肩袖撕裂的全关节镜与关节镜辅助小切口修复方法比较

A comparison of full arthroscopic and arthroscopic-assisted mini-open repair methods in rotator cuff tears 1-3 cm in size.

作者信息

Karaman O, Karakus O, Saygi B

机构信息

Fatih Sultan Mehmet Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Omer Halis Demir University Hospital, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Teaching and Research Hospital, Turkey.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2018 Aug 22;15(3):894-898. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.08.011. eCollection 2018 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.jor.2018.08.011
PMID:30174376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6118155/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Retrospective evaluation of rotator cuff repair with arthroscopic or arthroscopic-assisted mini-open methods for a diagnosis of non-retracted rotator cuff tear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 45 patients underwent rotator cuff repair; Group 1 (n = 24) with arthroscopic-assisted mini-open method and Group 2 (n = 21) with full arthroscopic method.

RESULTS

Within both Group 1 and Group 2, a statistically significant results is p = 0.001. The patients of Group 2 were seen to return to daily life earlier than those of Group 1 (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients where full arthroscopic repair was applied, there was evidence of an earlier return to daily life.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective comparative study.

摘要

引言

对采用关节镜或关节镜辅助小切口方法修复肩袖以诊断非退缩性肩袖撕裂进行回顾性评估。

材料与方法

共有45例患者接受肩袖修复；第1组（n = 24）采用关节镜辅助小切口方法，第2组（n = 21）采用全关节镜方法。

结果

在第1组和第2组中，具有统计学意义的结果是p = 0.001。第2组患者比第1组患者更早恢复日常生活（p = 0.001）。

结论

采用全关节镜修复的患者，有证据表明其更早恢复日常生活。

证据级别

IV，回顾性比较研究。