Seeff Leonard B, Hoofnagle Jay H
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institute of Health, 31A Center Drive, Room 9A27, Building 37, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Clin Liver Dis. 2003 Feb;7(1):261-87. doi: 10.1016/s1089-3261(02)00078-8.
The incidence of newly acquired hepatitis C infection has diminished in the United States. This decline is largely because of a decrease in cases among IDUs for reasons that are unclear and, to a lesser extent, to testing of blood donors for HCV. The virus is transmitted by blood, and such transmission now occurs primarily through injection drug use, sex with an infected partner or multiple partners, and occupational exposure. Most infections become chronic, and therefore the prevalence of HCV infections is high, with about 3 million Americans estimated, to be chronically infected. HCV is a leading cause of cirrhosis, a common cause of HCC and the leading cause of liter transplantation in the United States. The disease spectrum associated with HCV infection varies greatly. Various studies have suggested that 3% to 10% of chronically infected patients will develop cirrhosis over a 20-year period, and these patients are at risk for HCC. Persons who are older at the time of infection, patients with continuous exposure to alcohol, and those coinfected with HIV or HBV demonstrate accelerated progression to more advanced liver disease. Conversely, individuals infected at a younger age have little or no disease progression over several decades. The diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C infection often is suggested by abnormalities in ALT levels and is established by EIA followed by confirmatory determination of HCV RNA. Several sensitive and specific assays are automated partly for the purposes of detecting HCV RNA and quantifying the viral level. Although there is little correlation between viral level and disease manifestations, these assays have proven useful in identifying those patients who are more likely to benefit from treatment and, particularly, in demonstrating successful response to treatment as defined by an SVR. Liver biopsy is useful in defining baseline abnormalities of liver disease and in enabling patients and healthcare providers to reach a decision regarding antiviral therapy. Noninvasive tests do not provide the information that can be obtained through liver biopsy. Information on the genotype of the virus is important to guide treatment decisions. Genotype 1, most commonly found in the United States, is less amenable to treatment than genotypes 2 or 3. Therefore, clinical trials of antiviral therapies require genotyping information for appropriate stratification of subjects. Recent therapeutic trials in defined, selected populations have shown clearly that combinations of interferons and ribavirin are more effective than monotherapy. Moreover, trials using pegylated interferons have yielded improved SVR rates with similar toxicity profiles. Results continue to show, however, that the SVR rate is less common in patients with genotype 1 infections, higher HCV RNA levels, or more advanced stages of fibrosis. Genotype 1 infections require therapy for 48 weeks, whereas shorter treatment is feasible in genotype 2 and 3 infections. In genotype 1, the lack of an early virologic response (< 2 log decrease in HCV RNA) is associated with failure to achieve an SVR. The SVR is lower in patients with advanced liver disease than in patients without cirrhosis. Ongoing trials are exploring the usefulness of combination therapy in various populations. Preliminary experience in IDUs, individuals coinfected with HIV, children, and other special groups suggests similar responses are achievable in these populations. Patients with acute hepatitis C may be treated, but specific recommendations for antiviral treatment must await further evaluation of the rate of spontaneous clearance of the virus and determination of the optimal time to initiate treatment. Preventive measures beyond blood-banking practices include prompt identification of infected individuals, awareness of the potential for perinatal transmission, implementation of safe injection practices, linkage of drug users to drug treatment programs. and implementation of community-based education and support programs to modify risk behavior. Some of these measures have been implemented successfully in the control of HIV infections, and it stands to reason that they would be valuable for reducing HCV transmission. Future advances in the diagnosis and management of hepatitis C require continued vigilance concerning the transmission of this infection, extending treatment to populations not evaluated previously in treatment trials, and the introduction of more effective therapies.
美国新感染丙型肝炎病毒的发病率已有所下降。这种下降主要是由于注射吸毒者中病例数减少,原因尚不清楚,在较小程度上也归因于对献血者进行丙型肝炎病毒检测。该病毒通过血液传播,目前这种传播主要通过注射吸毒、与受感染伴侣或多个伴侣发生性行为以及职业暴露发生。大多数感染会转为慢性,因此丙型肝炎病毒感染的患病率很高,据估计约有300万美国人受到慢性感染。丙型肝炎病毒是肝硬化的主要病因、肝细胞癌的常见病因以及美国肝移植的主要病因。与丙型肝炎病毒感染相关的疾病谱差异很大。各种研究表明,3%至10%的慢性感染患者在20年内会发展为肝硬化,这些患者有患肝细胞癌的风险。感染时年龄较大的人、持续接触酒精的患者以及同时感染艾滋病毒或乙肝病毒的人会加速发展为更严重的肝病。相反,年轻时感染的个体在几十年内几乎没有疾病进展。慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染的诊断通常由丙氨酸转氨酶水平异常提示,并通过酶免疫测定法确诊,随后确定丙型肝炎病毒核糖核酸。几种灵敏且特异的检测方法部分实现了自动化,用于检测丙型肝炎病毒核糖核酸并定量病毒水平。虽然病毒水平与疾病表现之间几乎没有相关性,但这些检测方法已被证明有助于识别那些更可能从治疗中获益的患者,特别是有助于证明按持续病毒学应答定义的治疗成功反应。肝活检有助于确定肝病的基线异常,并使患者和医疗服务提供者能够就抗病毒治疗做出决定。非侵入性检测无法提供通过肝活检获得的信息。病毒基因型信息对于指导治疗决策很重要。在美国最常见的1型基因型比2型或3型基因型更难治疗。因此,抗病毒治疗的临床试验需要基因型信息以便对受试者进行适当分层。在特定选定人群中进行的近期治疗试验清楚地表明,干扰素和利巴韦林联合使用比单一疗法更有效。此外,使用聚乙二醇化干扰素的试验提高了持续病毒学应答率,且毒性特征相似。然而,结果继续表明,1型基因型感染患者、丙型肝炎病毒核糖核酸水平较高或纤维化程度较严重阶段的患者持续病毒学应答率较低。1型基因型感染需要治疗48周,而2型和3型基因型感染可行较短疗程的治疗。在1型基因型中,缺乏早期病毒学应答(丙型肝炎病毒核糖核酸下降<2个对数)与无法实现持续病毒学应答相关。晚期肝病患者的持续病毒学应答率低于无肝硬化的患者。正在进行的试验正在探索联合治疗在不同人群中的效用。在注射吸毒者、同时感染艾滋病毒的个体、儿童和其他特殊群体中的初步经验表明,这些人群也可实现类似的反应。急性丙型肝炎患者可以接受治疗,但抗病毒治疗的具体建议必须等待对病毒自发清除率的进一步评估以及确定开始治疗的最佳时间。除了血库操作之外的预防措施包括及时识别受感染个体、认识围产期传播的可能性、实施安全注射措施、将吸毒者与戒毒治疗项目联系起来,以及实施基于社区的教育和支持项目以改变危险行为。其中一些措施已在控制艾滋病毒感染方面成功实施,因此有理由认为它们对于减少丙型肝炎病毒传播也很有价值。丙型肝炎诊断和管理的未来进展需要继续警惕这种感染的传播,将治疗扩展到以前未在治疗试验中评估的人群,并引入更有效的疗法。