Kam Michael K M, Chau Ricky M C, Suen Joyce, Choi Peter H K, Teo Peter M L
Department of Clinical Oncology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 May 1;56(1):145-57. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00075-0.
To compare intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with two-dimensional RT (2D-RT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) treatment plans in different stages of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and to explore the feasibility of dose escalation in locally advanced disease.
Three patients with different stages (T1N0M0, T2bN2M0 with retrostyloid extension, and T4N2M0) were selected, and 2D-RT, 3D-CRT, and IMRT treatment plans (66 Gy) were made for each of them and compared with respect to target coverage, normal tissue sparing, and tumor control probability/normal tissue complication probability values. In the Stage T2b and T4 patients, the IMRT 66-Gy plan was combined with a 3D-CRT 14-Gy boost plan using a 3-mm micromultileaf collimator, and the dose-volume histograms of the summed plans were compared with their corresponding 66-Gy 2D-RT plans.
In the dosimetric comparison of 2D-RT, 3D-CRT, and IMRT treatment plans, the T1N0M0 patient had better sparing of the parotid glands and temporomandibular joints with IMRT (dose to 50% parotid volume, 57 Gy, 50 Gy, and 31 Gy, respectively). In the T2bN2M0 patient, the dose to 95% volume of the planning target volume improved from 57.5 Gy in 2D-RT to 64.8 Gy in 3D-CRT and 68 Gy in IMRT. In the T4N2M0 patient, improvement in both target coverage and brainstem/temporal lobe sparing was seen with IMRT planning. In the dose-escalation study for locally advanced disease, IMRT 66 Gy plus 14 Gy 3D-CRT boost achieved an improvement in the therapeutic ratio by delivering a higher dose to the target while keeping the normal organs below the maximal tolerance dose.
IMRT is useful in treating all stages of nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma because of its dosimetric advantages. In early-stage disease, it provides better parotid gland sparing. In locally advanced disease, IMRT offers better tumor coverage and normal organ sparing and allows room for dose escalation.
比较调强放射治疗(IMRT)与二维放射治疗(2D-RT)及三维适形放射治疗(3D-CRT)在鼻咽癌不同分期中的治疗计划,并探讨局部晚期疾病剂量递增的可行性。
选取3例不同分期(T1N0M0、有茎突后延伸的T2bN2M0以及T4N2M0)的患者,为每例患者制定2D-RT、3D-CRT及IMRT治疗计划(66 Gy),并在靶区覆盖、正常组织保护以及肿瘤控制概率/正常组织并发症概率值方面进行比较。在T2b期和T4期患者中,IMRT 66-Gy计划与使用3毫米微型多叶准直器的3D-CRT 14-Gy推量计划相结合,并将联合计划的剂量体积直方图与其相应的66-Gy 2D-RT计划进行比较。
在2D-RT、3D-CRT及IMRT治疗计划的剂量学比较中,T1N0M0患者的腮腺和颞下颌关节在IMRT时保护更好(腮腺50%体积的剂量分别为57 Gy、50 Gy和31 Gy)。在T2bN2M0患者中,计划靶区95%体积的剂量从2D-RT的57.5 Gy提高到3D-CRT的64.8 Gy和IMRT的68 Gy。在T4N2M0患者中,IMRT计划在靶区覆盖和脑干/颞叶保护方面均有改善。在局部晚期疾病的剂量递增研究中,IMRT 66 Gy加14 Gy 3D-CRT推量通过向靶区给予更高剂量同时使正常器官低于最大耐受剂量,实现了治疗比的提高。
由于其剂量学优势,IMRT对非转移性鼻咽癌的各期治疗均有用。在早期疾病中,它能更好地保护腮腺。在局部晚期疾病中,IMRT能提供更好的肿瘤覆盖和正常器官保护,并为剂量递增留出空间。