中国和美国护理学本科学生对批判性思维的情感倾向比较

Comparison affective dispositions toward critical thinking across Chinese and American baccalaureate nursing students.

作者信息

Yeh Mei-Ling, Chen Hsing-Hsia

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Integration of Traditional Chinese Medicine with Western Nursing, National Taipei College of Nursing, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Nurs Res. 2003 Mar;11(1):39-46. doi: 10.1097/01.jnr.0000347617.29413.96.

Abstract

The purpose of this cross-cultural study is to understand and compare affective dispositions toward critical thinking across Chinese and American cultures. Two convenience samples of 214 and 196 undergraduate nursing students were obtained in Taiwan and the USA, respectively. The California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory (CCTDI) was used to measure critical thinking dispositions. The ages of the students in these samples ranged from 19 to 28 ( M = 22, SD = 1.87) for the Chinese sample, and from 20 to 51 (M = 28, SD = 6.08) for the American. For the Chinese sample, all means of the seven subscale scores were above 40, except for truth seeking, systematicity and maturity. For the American sample, all means of the seven subscale scores were above 40, except for truth seeking. The mean item responses for each subscale were significantly different between the two samples [F (1, 408) = 54.11, p <.01] and across the subscales [F (6, 2448) = 905, p <.01]. Significant differences between the two samples were also found in truth-seeking, t(408) = 14.70 (p <.001), open- mindedness, t(408) = 6.17 (p <.001), systematicity, t(408) = 4.73 (p <.001) and maturity, t(408) = 10.46 (p <.001). The findings provide information to understand affective dispositions toward critical thinking in either Chinese or American students. The differences may contribute to the cultural differences shown in their dispositions.

摘要

这项跨文化研究的目的是了解和比较中美文化中对批判性思维的情感倾向。分别在台湾和美国选取了两个便利样本,样本一有214名本科护理专业学生,样本二有196名本科护理专业学生。使用加利福尼亚批判性思维倾向量表(CCTDI)来测量批判性思维倾向。中国样本中学生的年龄在19至28岁之间(M = 22,SD = 1.87),美国样本中学生的年龄在20至51岁之间(M = 28,SD = 6.08)。对于中国样本,除了寻求真理、系统性和成熟度外,七个分量表分数的所有均值均高于40。对于美国样本,除了寻求真理外,七个分量表分数的所有均值均高于40。两个样本之间每个分量表的平均项目反应存在显著差异[F(1, 408)= 54.11,p <.01],并且在各分量表之间也存在显著差异[F(6, 2448)= 905,p <.01]。在寻求真理方面,两个样本之间也存在显著差异,t(408)= 14.70(p <.001);在开放性思维方面,t(408)= 6.17(p <.001);在系统性方面,t(408)= 4.73(p <.001);在成熟度方面,t(408)= 10.46(p <.001)。这些发现为了解中国或美国学生对批判性思维的情感倾向提供了信息。这些差异可能导致他们在倾向方面表现出文化差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索