Suppr超能文献

本科护理专业学生的批判性思维技能与倾向——一种评估概念模型

Critical thinking skills and dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students--a conceptual model for evaluation.

作者信息

Colucciello M L

机构信息

University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, School of Nursing 54901, USA.

出版信息

J Prof Nurs. 1997 Jul-Aug;13(4):236-45. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(97)80094-4.

Abstract

To date, little has been written on specifically what critical thinking is and what the scores reported on critical thinking instruments actually represent. This lack of specificity provided the impetus to examine critical thinking skills and dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students, to ascertain whether or not a significant difference exists between academic levels, and to ascertain, using the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST) and the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI), whether a relationship exists between nursing students' critical thinking skills and their critical thinking dispositions. The conceptualization of critical thinking consisting of two dimensions, cognitive skills and affective dispositions, developed by a panel of experts comprised the conceptual framework for this study. A cross-sectional, descriptive, comparative, and correlational study was undertaken in which two instruments, CCTST, Form A, and the CCTDI were administered to a convenience sample of nursing students representing five academic levels. The sample in the statistical analyses comprised 328 students. Results indicated that the total critical thinking mean score for students at each level reflected percentile ranking ranging between 48 and 65 per cent. The mean score for the critical thinking subscale, inference, had the lowest percentile rankings, ranging between 37 and 55 per cent. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) statistical analysis indicated that students at the junior I level had the highest critical thinking mean scores, and students at the sophomore II level attained the lowest scores, reflecting a significant difference (P < or = .05). ANOVA also indicated a significant difference in the total critical thinking disposition mean scores between students at the junior I and senior I and II levels and those at the sophomore II level (P < or = .0000). Results indicated weak truth-seeking disposition scores among students at all levels. Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient yielded a significant positive relationship between critical thinking skills and critical thinking dispositions (P < or = .01). The conceptual model, as well as its relevancy to the professional standards of Essentials for College and University Education for Professional Nursing (AACN, 1986), is presented. Recommendations are discussed in regard to nursing education, curriculum, and research.

摘要

迄今为止,关于批判性思维具体是什么以及批判性思维工具所报告的分数实际代表什么的论述甚少。这种缺乏明确性的情况促使我们去研究本科护理专业学生的批判性思维技能和倾向,以确定不同学术水平之间是否存在显著差异,并使用加利福尼亚批判性思维技能测试(CCTST)和加利福尼亚批判性思维倾向问卷(CCTDI)来确定护理专业学生的批判性思维技能与他们的批判性思维倾向之间是否存在关联。由一组专家提出的批判性思维概念化包括认知技能和情感倾向两个维度,构成了本研究的概念框架。我们开展了一项横断面、描述性、比较性和相关性研究,向代表五个学术水平的护理专业学生便利样本发放了两种工具,即A版CCTST和CCTDI。统计分析中的样本包括328名学生。结果表明,每个水平的学生批判性思维总平均分对应的百分等级在48%至65%之间。批判性思维子量表“推理”的平均分对应的百分等级最低,在37%至55%之间。方差分析(ANOVA)统计分析表明,大一学生的批判性思维平均得分最高,大二学生得分最低,差异具有统计学意义(P≤0.05)。方差分析还表明,大一、大四和大五学生与大二学生在批判性思维倾向总平均分上存在显著差异(P≤0.0000)。结果表明,所有水平的学生在追求真理倾向上的得分都较低。皮尔逊积差相关系数显示,批判性思维技能与批判性思维倾向之间存在显著正相关(P≤0.01)。本文呈现了该概念模型及其与《专业护理本科及大学教育要素》(美国护理学院协会,1986年)专业标准的相关性。文中还讨论了关于护理教育、课程和研究的建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验