Ouattara A, Boccara G, Lemaire S, Köckler U, Landi M, Vaissier E, Léger P, Coriat P
Institute of Cardiology, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.
Br J Anaesth. 2003 May;90(5):617-22. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg124.
Propofol-anaesthesia administrated via target-controlled infusion (TCI) has been proposed for cardiac surgery. Age-related changes in pharmacology explain why propofol dose requirement is reduced in elderly patients. However, the Marsh pharmacokinetic model incorporated in the Diprifusor propofol device does not take age into account as a covariable. In the absence of depth of anaesthesia monitoring, this limitation could cause adverse cardiovascular effects resulting from propofol overdose in older patients. We assessed the influence of age on effect-site propofol concentrations predicted by the Diprifusor and titrated to the bispectral index score (BIS) during cardiac anaesthesia.
Forty-five patients received propofol by Diprifusor and remifentanil by software including Minto model. Propofol and remifentanil effect-site concentrations were adapted to BIS (40-60) and haemodynamic profile, respectively. The influence of age on effect-site concentrations was assessed by dividing patients into two groups: young (<65 yr) and elderly (> or =65 yr).
For a similar depth of anaesthesia, effect-site propofol concentrations were significantly lower in elderly patients at the different stages of cardiac surgery. The mean dose of propofol required to perform tracheal intubation was significantly lower in elderly patients. However, the overall doses of propofol were comparable in both groups. Neither effect-site remifentanil concentrations nor overall doses of remifentanil were significantly different between the two groups.
In cardiac anaesthesia, target concentrations of propofol must be reduced in elderly patients. Although this probably contributes to improving intraoperative haemodynamic stability, the absence of decrease in overall dose requirement of propofol suggests that this adjustment is relatively moderate.
已有人提出在心脏手术中采用靶控输注(TCI)给予丙泊酚麻醉。药理学上与年龄相关的变化解释了老年患者丙泊酚剂量需求降低的原因。然而,Diprifusor丙泊酚装置中纳入的Marsh药代动力学模型并未将年龄作为协变量考虑在内。在缺乏麻醉深度监测的情况下,这一局限性可能导致老年患者因丙泊酚过量而产生不良心血管效应。我们评估了年龄对心脏麻醉期间通过Diprifusor预测并滴定至脑电双频指数(BIS)的效应室丙泊酚浓度的影响。
45例患者通过Diprifusor接受丙泊酚,并通过包含Minto模型的软件接受瑞芬太尼。丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼的效应室浓度分别根据BIS(40 - 60)和血流动力学情况进行调整。通过将患者分为两组来评估年龄对效应室浓度的影响:年轻组(<65岁)和老年组(≥65岁)。
在相似的麻醉深度下,老年患者在心脏手术不同阶段的效应室丙泊酚浓度显著更低。老年患者气管插管所需丙泊酚的平均剂量显著更低。然而,两组丙泊酚的总剂量相当。两组之间效应室瑞芬太尼浓度和瑞芬太尼总剂量均无显著差异。
在心脏麻醉中,老年患者必须降低丙泊酚的靶浓度。尽管这可能有助于改善术中血流动力学稳定性,但丙泊酚总剂量需求未降低表明这种调整相对适度。