• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

格列美脲与格列本脲所致严重低血糖的特征及时间进程

Characteristics and time course of severe glimepiride- versus glibenclamide-induced hypoglycaemia.

作者信息

Holstein A, Plaschke A, Hammer C, Egberts E-H

机构信息

1st Department of Medicine, Klinikum Lippe-Detmold, Röntgenstrasse 18, 32756 Detmold, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Jun;59(2):91-7. doi: 10.1007/s00228-003-0592-4. Epub 2003 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00228-003-0592-4
PMID:12698302
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical characteristics and time course of severe hypoglycaemia (SH) on glimepiride and the reference drug glibenclamide.

METHODS

SH was defined as a symptomatic event requiring administration of i.v. glucose or of glucagon. Four hundred doctors working in acute care hospitals were randomly selected from the membership directory of the German Diabetes Association and sent a standardised questionnaire about sulphonylurea-induced SH that occurred between June 2001 and August 2002. Detailed data on history, medication, laboratory parameters, treatment and time course of the SH were analysed.

RESULTS

Altogether, 93 episodes of SH were registered, 37 on glimepiride and 56 on glibenclamide. The characteristics of the glimepiride- versus glibenclamide-induced SH were as follows: initial blood glucose 1.9+/-0.66 mmol/l versus 1.8+/-0.89 mmol/l, P=0.17; age 77+/-11.2 years versus 78+/-9.6 years, P=0.35; HbA1c 5.4+/-0.7% versus 5.2+/-0.9%, P=0.18; creatinine clearance 38+/-23 ml/min versus 54+/-32 ml/min, P=0.005; co-medication 6.2.+/-3 versus 3.6+/-3 preparations, P< 0.0001. Even very low doses of glimepiride (0.5 mg) and glibenclamide (0.88 mg) were associated with SH. Prolonged hypoglycaemia requiring more than 12 h i.v. glucose administration occurred in 8 of 37 of the glimepiride-treated subjects and 5 of 56 of those on glibenclamide. Prolonged hypoglycaemia necessitated infusion of 308+/-256 g (104-862 g) i.v. glucose over 43+/-16 h (24-64 h) in glimepiride-treated patients compared with 168+/-98 g (66-300 g) over 33+/-28 h (14-80 h) in glibenclamide-treated patients. Impaired renal function was present in 11 of 13 of all patients with prolonged hypoglycaemia and impaired liver function in 1 of 13.

CONCLUSION

In glimepiride- and glibenclamide-treated individuals with SH, no essential differences in the clinical characteristics or time course were shown; prolonged courses also occurred on glimepiride. Even in patients with only mild renal failure both preparations should be used with caution.

摘要

目的

比较格列美脲与对照药物格列本脲所致严重低血糖(SH)的临床特征及病程。

方法

SH定义为需要静脉注射葡萄糖或胰高血糖素的症状性事件。从德国糖尿病协会会员名录中随机选取400名在急症医院工作的医生,向他们发送一份关于2001年6月至2002年8月期间磺脲类药物所致SH的标准化问卷。分析有关SH的病史、用药、实验室参数、治疗及病程的详细数据。

结果

共记录到93例SH事件,其中37例由格列美脲引起,56例由格列本脲引起。格列美脲与格列本脲所致SH的特征如下:初始血糖1.9±0.66 mmol/L对1.8±0.89 mmol/L,P = 0.17;年龄77±11.2岁对78±9.6岁,P = 0.35;糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)5.4±0.7%对5.2±0.9%,P = 0.18;肌酐清除率38±23 ml/min对54±32 ml/min,P = 0.005;合并用药6.2±3种对3.6±3种制剂,P < 0.0001。即使是非常低剂量的格列美脲(0.5 mg)和格列本脲(0.88 mg)也与SH有关。在接受格列美脲治疗的37名受试者中有8例发生需要静脉输注葡萄糖超过12小时的持续性低血糖,接受格列本脲治疗的56名受试者中有5例发生。与接受格列本脲治疗的患者相比,接受格列美脲治疗的患者需要在43±16小时(24 - 64小时)内静脉输注308±256 g(104 - 862 g)葡萄糖,而接受格列本脲治疗的患者需要在33±28小时(14 - 80小时)内静脉输注168±98 g(66 - 300 g)葡萄糖。在所有发生持续性低血糖的患者中,13例中有11例存在肾功能损害,13例中有1例存在肝功能损害。

结论

在接受格列美脲和格列本脲治疗发生SH的患者中,未显示出临床特征或病程有本质差异;格列美脲也会出现病程延长的情况。即使是仅患有轻度肾衰竭的患者,两种制剂均应谨慎使用。

相似文献

1
Characteristics and time course of severe glimepiride- versus glibenclamide-induced hypoglycaemia.格列美脲与格列本脲所致严重低血糖的特征及时间进程
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Jun;59(2):91-7. doi: 10.1007/s00228-003-0592-4. Epub 2003 Apr 16.
2
Lower incidence of severe hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with glimepiride versus glibenclamide.与使用格列本脲治疗的2型糖尿病患者相比,使用格列美脲治疗的患者严重低血糖发生率更低。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2001 Nov-Dec;17(6):467-73. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.235.
3
Efficacy of glimepiride/metformin combination versus glibenclamide/metformin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus.格列美脲/二甲双胍联合治疗与格列本脲/二甲双胍治疗控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效。
J Diabetes Complications. 2009 Nov-Dec;23(6):376-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2008.09.002. Epub 2008 Oct 11.
4
Hormonal counterregulation and consecutive glimepiride serum concentrations during severe hypoglycaemia associated with glimepiride therapy.与格列美脲治疗相关的严重低血糖期间的激素对抗调节及随后的格列美脲血清浓度
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Dec;59(10):747-54. doi: 10.1007/s00228-003-0697-9. Epub 2003 Nov 22.
5
Long-term treatment of type 2 diabetic patients with the new oral antidiabetic agent glimepiride (Amaryl): a double-blind comparison with glibenclamide.新型口服抗糖尿病药物格列美脲(亚莫利)对2型糖尿病患者的长期治疗:与格列本脲的双盲对照研究
Horm Metab Res. 1996 Sep;28(9):419-25. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-979830.
6
The effect of glimepiride on pancreatic beta-cell function under hyperglycaemic clamp and hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic clamp conditions in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.在非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者中,高血糖钳夹及高胰岛素正常血糖钳夹条件下格列美脲对胰岛β细胞功能的影响。
Horm Metab Res. 1996 Sep;28(9):445-50. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-979835.
7
Drug-induced severe hypoglycaemia in Type 2 diabetic patients aged 80 years or older.80岁及以上2型糖尿病患者药物性严重低血糖症
Diabetes Nutr Metab. 2004 Feb;17(1):23-6.
8
The effects of acute exercise on metabolic control in type II diabetic patients treated with glimepiride or glibenclamide.急性运动对使用格列美脲或格列本脲治疗的II型糖尿病患者代谢控制的影响。
Horm Metab Res. 1996 Sep;28(9):451-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-979836.
9
Regardless of the degree of glycaemic control, linagliptin has lower hypoglycaemia risk than all doses of glimepiride, at all time points, over the course of a 2-year trial.无论血糖控制程度如何,在 2 年的试验过程中,在所有时间点,利拉利汀的低血糖风险均低于所有剂量的格列美脲。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Mar;17(3):276-84. doi: 10.1111/dom.12419. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
10
Glimepiride. A review of its use in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.格列美脲。关于其在2型糖尿病管理中应用的综述。
Drugs. 1998 Apr;55(4):563-84. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199855040-00007.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal Trends of Severe Hypoglycemia and Subsequent Mortality in Patients with Advanced Diabetic Kidney Diseases Transitioning to Dialysis.晚期糖尿病肾病患者转为透析后严重低血糖及随后死亡率的时间趋势
J Clin Med. 2019 Mar 27;8(4):420. doi: 10.3390/jcm8040420.
2
Drug Interactions of Clinical Importance with Antihyperglycaemic Agents : An Update.抗高血糖药物的临床重要药物相互作用:最新进展
Drug Saf. 2005 Jul;28(7):601-631. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200528070-00004.
3
Update on the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.2型糖尿病治疗的最新进展

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of glimepiride on insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis in cultured human skeletal muscle cells: a comparison to glibenclamide.格列美脲对培养的人骨骼肌细胞中胰岛素刺激的糖原合成的影响:与格列本脲的比较。
Diabetes Care. 2002 Dec;25(12):2129-32. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.12.2129.
2
Impact of CYP2C9 amino acid polymorphisms on glyburide kinetics and on the insulin and glucose response in healthy volunteers.CYP2C9氨基酸多态性对健康志愿者中格列本脲动力学以及胰岛素和葡萄糖反应的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002 Apr;71(4):286-96. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2002.122476.
3
Lower incidence of severe hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with glimepiride versus glibenclamide.
World J Diabetes. 2016 Sep 15;7(17):354-95. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v7.i17.354.
4
Interactions between kidney disease and diabetes: dangerous liaisons.肾脏疾病与糖尿病之间的相互作用:危险关系。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2016 Jul 28;8:50. doi: 10.1186/s13098-016-0159-z. eCollection 2016.
5
Haemodialysis-induced hypoglycaemia and glycaemic disarrays.血液透析引起的低血糖和血糖紊乱。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2015 May;11(5):302-13. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2015.38. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
6
CYP2C9, KCNJ11 and ABCC8 polymorphisms and the response to sulphonylurea treatment in type 2 diabetes patients.CYP2C9、KCNJ11 和 ABCC8 多态性与 2 型糖尿病患者磺脲类药物治疗反应的关系。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;70(4):421-8. doi: 10.1007/s00228-014-1641-x. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
7
Glycemic variability and glycemic control in the acutely ill cardiac patient.急性心脏疾病患者的血糖变异性和血糖控制。
Heart Fail Clin. 2012 Oct;8(4):523-38. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
8
Hypoglycemia revisited in the acute care setting.在急症护理环境中重新审视低血糖症。
Yonsei Med J. 2011 Nov;52(6):898-908. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2011.52.6.898.
9
Disorders of glucose metabolism-post mortem analyses in forensic cases: part I.葡萄糖代谢紊乱-法医案例的死后分析:第一部分。
Int J Legal Med. 2011 Mar;125(2):163-70. doi: 10.1007/s00414-010-0509-6. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
10
Self-monitoring of blood glucose in diabetes mellitus: arguments for an individualized approach.糖尿病的自我血糖监测:个体化方法的论据。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 Sep;106(37):587-94. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0587. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
与使用格列本脲治疗的2型糖尿病患者相比,使用格列美脲治疗的患者严重低血糖发生率更低。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2001 Nov-Dec;17(6):467-73. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.235.
4
Effect of gemfibrozil on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glimepiride.吉非贝齐对格列美脲药代动力学和药效学的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Nov;70(5):439-45. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2001.119723.
5
Glimepiride block of cloned beta-cell, cardiac and smooth muscle K(ATP) channels.格列美脲对克隆的β细胞、心脏和平滑肌K(ATP)通道的阻断作用。
Br J Pharmacol. 2001 May;133(1):193-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704062.
6
Effects of fluconazole and fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glimepiride.氟康唑和氟伏沙明对格列美脲药代动力学和药效学的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Apr;69(4):194-200. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2001.114229.
7
Sulphonylurea dose-response relationships: relation to clinical practice.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2000 Jan;2(1):25-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1326.2000.00046.x.
8
Drug-drug interactions in medical patients: effects of in-hospital treatment and relation to multiple drug use.住院患者的药物相互作用:住院治疗的影响及其与多种药物使用的关系。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000 Nov;38(11):504-13. doi: 10.5414/cpp38504.
9
Prolonged sulfonylurea-induced hypoglycemia in diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2000 Mar;35(3):500-5. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(00)70204-6.
10
Comparative effects of glimepiride and glibenclamide on blood glucose, C-peptide and insulin concentrations in the fasting and postprandial state in normal man.格列美脲与格列本脲对正常男性空腹及餐后血糖、C肽和胰岛素浓度的比较作用。
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 1999;107(6):350-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1212125.