Draeger K E, Wernicke-Panten K, Lomp H J, Schüler E, Rosskamp R
Glimepiride Multicentre Study Group, Hoechst AG, Frankfurt, Germany.
Horm Metab Res. 1996 Sep;28(9):419-25. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-979830.
An international, prospective, double-blind trial compared the long-term therapeutic value of glimepiride with glibenclamide in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients stabilised on glibenclamide were randomised to 1 mg glimepiride (524 patients) or 2.5 mg glibenclamide (520 patients). The treatment groups were comparable at baseline with respect to age (60.2 years), body mass index (26.5 kg/m2), duration of diabetes (5.0 years) and fasting blood glucose levels (163 mg/dl [9.0 mmol/l]). Doses were increased stepwise, up to 8 mg for glimepiride (once-daily) and 20 mg for glibenclamide (> 10 mg as divided dose), until metabolic control (fasting blood glucose < or = 150 mg/dl [8.3 mmol/l]), or maximum dose was achieved. After one year of treatment, patients entered a long-term follow-up study. Primary endpoints for evaluation of metabolic control, mean glycated haemoglobin and mean fasting blood glucose, were 8.4% and 174 mg/dl (9.7 mmol/l) for glimepiride and 8.3% and 168 mg/dl (9.3 mmol/l) for glibenclamide. Differences between treatment groups were not considered clinically relevant (95% confidence intervals (-0.05, 0.19%) for glycated haemoglobin and (2, 11 mg/dl) [0.1, 0.6 mmol/l] for fasting blood glucose). Statistically significant lower fasting insulin and C-peptide values were observed in glimepiride patients compared with glibenclamide (differences: insulin, -0.92 microU/ml [p = 0.04]; C-peptide, -0.14 ng/ml [p = 0.03]). Both treatment groups showed an equivalent safety profile. Adverse events were consistent with the nature of the diabetic patient population studied. Fewer hypoglycaemic reactions occurred with glimepiride than with glibenclamide (105 versus 150 episodes). The long-term follow-up (457 patients) confirmed that glimepiride (1-8 mg) once daily provides equivalent metabolic control to a higher dosage (2.5-20.0 mg) of glibenclamide. Both treatments were well tolerated.
一项国际前瞻性双盲试验比较了格列美脲与格列本脲对2型糖尿病患者的长期治疗价值。将已用格列本脲稳定治疗的患者随机分为两组,一组服用1 mg格列美脲(524例患者),另一组服用2.5 mg格列本脲(520例患者)。治疗组在基线时的年龄(60.2岁)、体重指数(26.5 kg/m²)、糖尿病病程(5.0年)和空腹血糖水平(163 mg/dl [9.0 mmol/l])具有可比性。剂量逐步增加,格列美脲最高可达8 mg(每日一次),格列本脲最高可达20 mg(> 10 mg为分次给药),直至达到代谢控制(空腹血糖≤150 mg/dl [8.3 mmol/l])或达到最大剂量。治疗一年后,患者进入长期随访研究。评估代谢控制的主要终点,即平均糖化血红蛋白和平均空腹血糖,格列美脲组分别为8.4%和174 mg/dl(9.7 mmol/l),格列本脲组分别为8.3%和168 mg/dl(9.3 mmol/l)。治疗组之间的差异在临床上不具有相关性(糖化血红蛋白的95%置信区间为(-0.05, 0.19%),空腹血糖的95%置信区间为(2, 11 mg/dl) [0.1, 0.6 mmol/l])。与格列本脲组相比,格列美脲组患者的空腹胰岛素和C肽值在统计学上显著降低(差异:胰岛素,-0.92 microU/ml [p = 0.04];C肽,-0.14 ng/ml [p = 0.03])。两个治疗组的安全性相当。不良事件与所研究的糖尿病患者群体的性质一致。格列美脲引起的低血糖反应比格列本脲少(105次发作对150次发作)。长期随访(457例患者)证实,每日一次服用格列美脲(1 - 8 mg)与较高剂量(2.5 - 20.0 mg)的格列本脲具有同等的代谢控制效果。两种治疗方法的耐受性都很好。