• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于测量阅读能力增长的拉施同时垂直等值法

Rasch simultaneous vertical equating for measuring reading growth.

作者信息

Lee Ong Kim

机构信息

National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

出版信息

J Appl Meas. 2003;4(1):10-23.

PMID:12700428
Abstract

The longitudinal measurement of ability growth requires that the measures that are taken at the various time points be obtained using the same yardstick. Tests given for this purpose, therefore, need to be equated. The popular practice still in use for the purpose of equating tests, is the grade-equivalent. This paper compares the observation of children's growth in reading using grade-equivalents with that using Rasch Simultaneous Vertical Equating procedure. It is found that grade equivalents differ much more between two different test forms compared to ability measures obtained using Rasch Simultaneous Vertical Equating. It is also found that the spread of students' grade-equivalents, increased over the years as they grow while the standard deviations of their Rasch measures remain relatively constant over the same period of time. Student responses to the ITBS Form 7 and the CPS90 and CPS 91 were used. A total of 5,623 students were tracked over eight years.

摘要

能力增长的纵向测量要求在不同时间点所采用的测量方法要使用同一标准。因此,为此目的所进行的测试需要进行等值处理。目前仍在用于测试等值处理的普遍做法是年级当量。本文比较了使用年级当量与使用拉施同时垂直等值程序来观察儿童阅读能力增长的情况。研究发现,与使用拉施同时垂直等值法获得的能力测量结果相比,两种不同测试形式之间的年级当量差异要大得多。还发现,随着学生逐年成长,他们的年级当量分布有所增加,而在同一时间段内,他们的拉施测量标准差则保持相对稳定。使用了学生对ITBS表格7以及CPS90和CPS 91的回答。在八年时间里对总共5623名学生进行了跟踪。

相似文献

1
Rasch simultaneous vertical equating for measuring reading growth.用于测量阅读能力增长的拉施同时垂直等值法
J Appl Meas. 2003;4(1):10-23.
2
Overcoming vertical equating complications in the calibration of an integer ability scale for measuring outcomes of a teaching experiment.
J Appl Meas. 2008;9(3):281-304.
3
Equating designs and procedures used in Rasch scaling.等同于拉施量表中使用的设计和程序。
J Appl Meas. 2010;11(2):182-95.
4
Simultaneous measurement of reading growth, gender, and relative-age effects: many-faceted Rasch applied to CBM reading scores.同时测量阅读能力增长、性别和相对年龄效应:多面Rasch模型应用于CBM阅读分数
J Appl Meas. 2000;1(4):393-408.
5
Equating and item banking with the Rasch model.将等值和题库建设与拉施模型相结合。
J Appl Meas. 2000;1(4):409-34.
6
Evaluation of the 0.3 logits screening criterion in common item equating.共同项目等值中0.3对数单位筛选标准的评估
J Appl Meas. 2004;5(2):172-7.
7
Validating standard setting with a modified nedelsky procedure through common item test equating.通过共同项目测试等值,使用改良的内德尔斯基程序验证标准设定。
J Outcome Meas. 1997;1(2):164-72.
8
Tools for measuring academic growth.
J Appl Meas. 2009;10(1):97-116.
9
Comparing concurrent versus fixed parameter equating with common items: using the dichotomous and partial credit models in a mixed-item format test.比较共同题目的并发参数等值与固定参数等值:在混合题型测试中使用二分法模型和部分计分模型
J Appl Meas. 2007;8(1):84-96.
10
Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.拉施拟合统计作为项目参数估计不变性的一种检验。
J Appl Meas. 2003;4(2):153-63.