Karcz-Kubicha Marzena, Antoniou Katerina, Terasmaa Anton, Quarta Davide, Solinas Marcello, Justinova Zuzana, Pezzola Antonella, Reggio Rosaria, Müller Christa E, Fuxe Kjell, Goldberg Steven R, Popoli Patrizia, Ferré Sergi
Preclinical Pharmacology Section, Behavioral Neuroscience Branch, NIDA, NIH, IRP, Department of Health and Human Services, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003 Jul;28(7):1281-91. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300167. Epub 2003 Apr 9.
The involvement of adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors in the motor effects of caffeine is still a matter of debate. In the present study, counteraction of the motor-depressant effects of the selective A(1) receptor agonist CPA and the A(2A) receptor agonist CGS 21680 by caffeine, the selective A(1) receptor antagonist CPT, and the A(2A) receptor antagonist MSX-3 was compared. CPT and MSX-3 produced motor activation at the same doses that selectively counteracted motor depression induced by CPA and CGS 21680, respectively. Caffeine also counteracted motor depression induced by CPA and CGS 21680 at doses that produced motor activation. However, caffeine was less effective than CPT at counteracting CPA and even less effective than MSX-3 at counteracting CGS 21680. On the other hand, when administered alone in habituated animals, caffeine produced stronger motor activation than CPT or MSX-3. An additive effect on motor activation was obtained when CPT and MSX-3 were coadministered. Altogether, these results suggest that the motor-activating effects of acutely administered caffeine in rats involve the central blockade of both A(1) and A(2A) receptors. Chronic exposure to caffeine in the drinking water (1.0 mg/ml) resulted in tolerance to the motor effects of an acute administration of caffeine, lack of tolerance to amphetamine, apparent tolerance to MSX-3 (shift to the left of its 'bell-shaped' dose-response curve), and true cross-tolerance to CPT. The present results suggest that development of tolerance to the effects of A(1) receptor blockade might be mostly responsible for the tolerance to the motor-activating effects of caffeine and that the residual motor-activating effects of caffeine in tolerant individuals might be mostly because of A(2A) receptor blockade.
腺苷A(1)和A(2A)受体在咖啡因运动效应中的作用仍存在争议。在本研究中,比较了咖啡因、选择性A(1)受体拮抗剂CPT和A(2A)受体拮抗剂MSX-3对选择性A(1)受体激动剂CPA和A(2A)受体激动剂CGS 21680运动抑制效应的对抗作用。CPT和MSX-3分别在选择性对抗CPA和CGS 21680诱导的运动抑制的相同剂量下产生运动激活。咖啡因在产生运动激活的剂量下也能对抗CPA和CGS 21680诱导的运动抑制。然而,咖啡因在对抗CPA方面比CPT效果差,在对抗CGS 21680方面甚至比MSX-3效果更差。另一方面,当单独给予习惯化动物时,咖啡因产生的运动激活比CPT或MSX-3更强。当CPT和MSX-3联合给药时,对运动激活有相加作用。总之,这些结果表明,急性给予大鼠咖啡因的运动激活作用涉及对A(1)和A(2A)受体的中枢性阻断。长期饮用含咖啡因的水(1.0毫克/毫升)导致对急性给予咖啡因的运动效应产生耐受性,对苯丙胺无耐受性,对MSX-3有明显耐受性(其“钟形”剂量反应曲线向左移动),对CPT有真正的交叉耐受性。目前的结果表明,对A(1)受体阻断效应产生耐受性可能是对咖啡因运动激活效应产生耐受性的主要原因,而耐受性个体中咖啡因残留的运动激活效应可能主要是由于A(2A)受体阻断。