Sasaki Satoshi, Matsumura Yasuhiro, Ishihara Junko, Tsugane Shoichiro
Epidemiology and Biostatistics Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
J Epidemiol. 2003 Jan;13(1 Suppl):S106-14. doi: 10.2188/jea.13.1sup_106.
We examined the validity of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) used in the 5-year follow-up survey of the JPHC study for estimation of dietary fiber intake by comparing the intake estimated with dietary records (DR). We developed a food composition table for dietary fiber for the food items included in the FFQ using a substitution method. The Spearman correlation coefficients were slightly higher in crude values (0.48-0.51 in men, 0.40-0.45 in women) than in energy-adjusted values (0.43-0.44 in men, 0.36-0.40 in women). The correlation coefficients of food group-specific dietary fiber (crude) were 0.26 and 0.27 for vegetables, and 0.62 and 0.49 for fruits in men and women, respectively. The mean intakes assessed with the FFQ and DR were not statistically different either for water-soluble or -insoluble fiber in both men and women. However, the fruit fiber assessed with FFQ was significantly over- and the vegetable fiber was underestimated compared with those assessed with DRs. The FFQ can be used for ranking individuals for dietary fiber intakes in epidemiologic studies, despite the difficulty in estimating mean intake.
我们通过比较食物频率问卷(FFQ)估算的膳食纤维摄入量与膳食记录(DR)估算的摄入量,检验了在JPHC研究5年随访调查中使用的FFQ估算膳食纤维摄入量的有效性。我们采用替代法为FFQ中包含的食物项目编制了膳食纤维食物成分表。斯皮尔曼相关系数的原始值(男性为0.48 - 0.51,女性为0.40 - 0.45)略高于能量调整后的值(男性为0.43 - 0.44,女性为0.36 - 0.40)。男性和女性中,特定食物组膳食纤维(原始值)的相关系数,蔬菜分别为0.26和0.27,水果分别为0.62和0.49。男性和女性中,用FFQ和DR评估的水溶性或不溶性纤维的平均摄入量在统计学上均无差异。然而,与用DR评估的结果相比,用FFQ评估的水果纤维显著高估,蔬菜纤维低估。尽管估算平均摄入量存在困难,但FFQ可用于在流行病学研究中对个体的膳食纤维摄入量进行排名。