• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用单叠氮溴化乙锭和荧光原位杂交技术同时测定生物膜中细菌的活力和种类

Simultaneous determination of bacterial viability and identity in biofilms using ethidium monoazide and fluorescent in situ hybridization.

作者信息

Regan J M, Oldenburg P S, Park H D, Harrington G W, Noguera D R

机构信息

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 18802, USA.

出版信息

Water Sci Technol. 2003;47(5):123-8.

PMID:12701916
Abstract

A protocol for simultaneously interrogating bacterial viability and identity using in situ, culture-independent methods is described. Viability is assayed using ethidium monoazide (EMA) staining of cells with compromised membranes, and identity is determined using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Experiments with planktonic cultures were used to demonstrate the compatibility of EMA staining and FISH after covalently bonding EMA to nucleic acids by photoreaction. Applications to biofilm samples showed that diffusion limitations in the biofilm matrix were not problematic and that effective discrimination of viable target cells within a mixed microbial community was possible.

摘要

本文描述了一种使用原位、非培养方法同时检测细菌活力和鉴定细菌身份的方案。使用叠氮溴化乙锭(EMA)对细胞膜受损的细胞进行染色来检测活力,使用荧光原位杂交(FISH)来确定身份。通过光反应使EMA与核酸共价结合后,对浮游培养物进行的实验证明了EMA染色和FISH的兼容性。对生物膜样品的应用表明,生物膜基质中的扩散限制不成问题,并且能够有效区分混合微生物群落中的活靶细胞。

相似文献

1
Simultaneous determination of bacterial viability and identity in biofilms using ethidium monoazide and fluorescent in situ hybridization.使用单叠氮溴化乙锭和荧光原位杂交技术同时测定生物膜中细菌的活力和种类
Water Sci Technol. 2003;47(5):123-8.
2
Differentiation of genes extracted from non-viable versus viable micro-organisms in environmental samples using ethidium monoazide bromide.使用溴化乙锭单叠氮化物区分环境样品中不可培养与可培养微生物提取的基因。
J Microbiol Methods. 2007 Dec;71(3):312-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.09.015. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
3
Comparison of detection specificity of nitrifying bacteria in biofilm using fluorescence in situ hybridization and in situ fluorescent antibody methods.利用荧光原位杂交和原位荧光抗体法比较生物膜中硝化细菌的检测特异性
Water Sci Technol. 2003;47(5):129-32.
4
Microbial communities and their interactions in biofilm systems: an overview.生物膜系统中的微生物群落及其相互作用:综述
Water Sci Technol. 2004;49(11-12):327-36.
5
Effect of dissolved oxygen concentration on the biofilm and in situ analysis by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and microelectrodes.溶解氧浓度对生物膜的影响以及通过荧光原位杂交(FISH)和微电极进行原位分析
Water Sci Technol. 2003;47(1):49-57.
6
Comparison of propidium monoazide with ethidium monoazide for differentiation of live vs. dead bacteria by selective removal of DNA from dead cells.单叠氮碘化丙啶与单叠氮溴化乙锭通过选择性去除死细胞中的DNA来区分活细菌与死细菌的比较。
J Microbiol Methods. 2006 Nov;67(2):310-20. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2006.04.015. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
7
Application of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) coupled with ethidium monoazide treatment for selective quantification of viable bacteria in aquatic environment.实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)结合单叠氮化溴乙锭处理在水生环境中对活菌进行选择性定量分析的应用
Water Sci Technol. 2008;58(5):1107-12. doi: 10.2166/wst.2008.474.
8
Unsuitable distinction between viable and dead Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis by ethidium bromide monoazide.溴化乙锭单叠氮化物对金黄色葡萄球菌和表皮葡萄球菌活菌与死菌的区分不适用。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009 May;48(5):633-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02585.x. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
9
Discrimination of viable Vibrio vulnificus cells from dead cells in real-time PCR.实时PCR中区分创伤弧菌活细胞与死细胞
J Microbiol Methods. 2006 Jan;64(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.04.023. Epub 2005 Jun 1.
10
Quantification of total viable bacteria on fish fillets by using ethidium bromide monoazide real-time polymerase chain reaction.使用溴化乙锭单叠氮化物实时聚合酶链反应对鱼片上的总活菌进行定量分析。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2007 Sep 30;118(3):312-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.048. Epub 2007 Aug 6.