Oestmann Günther
Sudhoffs Arch. 2002;86(2):129-37.
The paper deals with the astronomical and astrological contents of a horoscope cast by John Flamsteed in 1675 for the foundation of Greenwich Observatory. So far no analysis of its astronomical contents has been made. It can be shown that the chart has been drawn correctly, as is to be expected from a competent astronomer. For calculating the planetary positions he most likely used tables issued by Johann Hecker, a pupil of Hevelius, based on Kepler's "Tabulae Rudolphinae" in 1627. The cusps of the twelve astrological houses Flamsteed calculated trigonometrically; so he used no table of houses. Flamsteed employed a method of house division (domification) which was commonly used in the 16th and 17th century and connected with the name of Johannes Regiomontanus. Positional circles joining in the north and south points of the observer's horizon are laid through distances of 30 degrees on the celestial equator, thus giving unequal sections of the ecliptic. By consulting contemporary sources for the interpretation of the chart (Ramesey's Astrologia Restaurata, 1653) it appears that the time for laying the foundation stone was well chosen from the astrological point of view. There were precursors in this practice, e.g. the Italian astrologer Luca Gaurico, who was commissioned to submit an astrological report for the foundation for the Franse Wing in the Vatican in 1543, and Tycho Brahe, who performed a solemn ceremony on the island of Hven in 1576 at the laying of the foundation stone of his observatory in an astrologically propitious moment. This leads to the question whether Flamsteed believed in astrology. Michael Hunter has already given evidence that Flamsteed was indeed well-versed with astrological techniques and supplied astrologers with data. But at the same time he expressed hostility towards astrological interpretations issued frequently by different parties during Civil War in England. In an unpublished preface for Hecker's Tables (edited by Hunter) Flamsteed tried to show the "Vanity of Astrology, & the Practice of Astrologers". Therefore he cannot be taken as an ardent astrologer, although he was well acquainted with the art.
本文探讨了约翰·弗拉姆斯蒂德于1675年为格林威治天文台奠基所绘制的天宫图中的天文和占星内容。到目前为止,尚未对其天文内容进行分析。可以证明,该星图绘制正确,这是一位称职的天文学家所应有的表现。为了计算行星位置,他很可能使用了约翰·赫克(约翰内斯·赫维留斯的学生)根据1627年开普勒的《鲁道夫星表》编制的表格。弗拉姆斯蒂德用三角学方法计算了十二个占星宫的宫头;因此他没有使用宫位表。弗拉姆斯蒂德采用了一种在16世纪和17世纪常用的宫位划分方法(定宫法),这种方法与约翰内斯·雷吉奥蒙塔努斯的名字有关。连接观测者地平线南北点的位置圈在天赤道上每隔30度划分一段距离,从而在黄道上形成不等分的区域。通过查阅同时期对该星图的解读资料(拉梅西的《占星术复兴》,1653年),从占星学角度来看,奠基时间似乎选得很好。这种做法有先例,例如意大利占星家卢卡·高里科,他在1543年受委托为梵蒂冈的法兰西翼楼奠基提交一份占星报告,还有第谷·布拉赫,他于1576年在文岛为他的天文台奠基时,在一个占星学上吉利的时刻举行了庄严的仪式。这就引出了一个问题,即弗拉姆斯蒂德是否相信占星术。迈克尔·亨特已经提供证据表明,弗拉姆斯蒂德确实精通占星术技巧,并为占星家提供数据。但与此同时,他对英国内战期间不同派别频繁发布的占星解读表示敌意。在为赫克的表格所写的一篇未发表的前言(由亨特编辑)中,弗拉姆斯蒂德试图展示“占星术的虚幻以及占星家的做法”。因此,尽管他对这门技艺很熟悉,但不能将他视为一个狂热的占星家。